Kansas Basketball: Are The Low-% Runner/Floater/Layups Really "Bad Shots"?
Really solid Fanpost from SagehenMacGyver47 yesterday. This definitely earned some extra run on FRONT PAGE FRIDAY!!! Good cannon fodder for a Friday before playing Oklahoma. - Owen
A lot of times people think those are bad shots when guards drive in there and shoot the floaters. They probably have a 20 percent chance to go in, but you have a 60 percent chance to rebound behind it, so those aren’t bad shots.
- Bill Self
After initially reading the quote from Bill Self, I was skeptical - I mean, he can't be happy with running floaters at 20%, can he? And could he really expect a rebounding rate of 60% when the team's overall offensive rebounding rate is about 35%?
I was more skeptical than most, I think, but after some discussion I figured if we assumed that Self was ballparking it or exaggerating a bit--maybe he was fudging from 30% and 50%, or thereabouts--he might actually be right, or at least close. (Note: Self didn't mention fouls, so that muddies the water a little bit.)
So what happened against Kansas State?
I define a "bad runner/floater/layup" as a close shot that's more likely to miss than go in. I know it's subjective, but when my feeling was "you shouldn't have shot that" if the expectation was to score on the shot itself, then I recorded it as taking a bad shot. The possible results are a made shot, an offensive rebound, a defensive rebound, or a foul on the shot.
I counted 14 "bad runner/floater/layup" shots. 2 of those resulted in fouls by KSU. Only 3 went in, for a FG% of 25% (21% if you count all 14); if you'd told me that only 3 of 12 shots went in from around the rim, I'd say "Why are we forcing these ill-advised shots?"; although this is apparently what Bill Self expected and approved of.
Now for the offensive rebounds. If you read the semi-stat recap, you know that KU's O rebound rate for the game was crazy high overall and that KSU's defensive rebounding rate for the season is very poor, so keep that in mind. KU rebounded 7 of these 9 misses. 78%. (Note: Two of them were scrambles where the ball went out of bounds off KSU and a third was a half rebound/steal where TRob took the ball out of the defender's hands right after he secured the rebound, so maybe there was some chaos/luck involved, but still: 78%.)
Points per possession (please check my math/approach/estimations):
14 possessions; 1.4 points from the fouls; 6 points from the makes; 8 points from 4 putbacks; 3 points for 3 additional rebounds at an estimated 1 PPP. That gives 18.4 for 14 possessions for a PPP of 1.3. I'll request that I re-read Bill's comment: "so those aren’t bad shots".
One last bit on missed layups. These were shots where a player had basically a very makeable shot from close range (as opposed to the 14 "bad" shots) and missed. One was blocked and two were just missed (I think). Of those 3 missed layups, 2 were rebounded by KU, for 67%. SSS is especially true for this, but it jives with the 60+% rate claimed by Self.
16 comments
|
4 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Were the putbacks gimmes?
I can think of two off the top of my head that were.
Glad I came, just wish I hadn't stayed so long.
Rock Chalk Talk
As I remember, they scored easily on four of them. Wish I had noted that b/c I'm not 100% sure.
Kila's slash for Apr 20 to May 4, 2011, right before he was sent down: .276 / .344 / .448
by SagehenMacGyver47 on Jan 5, 2012 3:35 PM CST up reply actions
I wish I had awesome video download/editing skills.
Glad I came, just wish I hadn't stayed so long.
Rock Chalk Talk
Great work
This is exactly what I meant about learning from Self. He makes a comment like that, you do the great work to break it down, and now we all see the game a little bit better.
Thanks for taking the time to do this.
Agreed...really good stuff here
All the more reason we need to get Elijah to quit living behind the arc and driving it too.
by hiphopopotamus on Jan 6, 2012 8:51 AM CST up reply actions
yes, though I should have done .7 times 4 since there were 4 FTs (two fouls = 4 FTs, duh for me)
That would give 19.8 / 14 = 1.4 PPP.
It’s still a very rough way to do it, but I think even if it were way off it only affects the overall PPP by a tenth of a point or so (as evidenced by my 50% error that only mattered 0.1).
Kila's slash for Apr 20 to May 4, 2011, right before he was sent down: .276 / .344 / .448
by SagehenMacGyver47 on Jan 5, 2012 5:29 PM CST up reply actions
I really didn't think this would work out this way
Awesome write-up though. Love the break down.
Also love that it actually does turn out pretty well.
Great work, Sagehen
I discovered at a very early age that if I talked long enough, I could make people believe whatever I wanted them to. So, either I'm God, or truth is relative. Either way, booyah.
If we call the 3 "lucky" rebounds 50/50 balls than the rebounding % is
(4 good rbs + .5(3 ‘50/50s’)) = 5.5 out 9 shots = 61.1%
Bill Self is GOD!
Exellent work on the analysis Sagehen!
I always drink the Kool-Aid
I wasn't jsut skeptical, I really thought Self was lost
But great post! I appreciate the explanation and the research of watching the game for those shots.
It's not that I'm lazy; it's that I just don't care.
As someone who loved the floater when I played
and was pretty damn good at it, I approve of it if one has it mastered. It’s a very finesse like shot that is all about the skill of knowing the right touch to put on it. The right loft and “touch” will get you a roll-in even if you don’t perfectly put it in. Some of my best memories are floaters over guys a foot taller than me. Ahh the good ole days.
by I need more Esteban on Jan 6, 2012 11:33 AM CST reply actions
Same here.
I have been told by quite a few guys I played against they thought they were getting ready for a volleyball spike and the ball skipped by just a few inches every time.
Glad I came, just wish I hadn't stayed so long.
Rock Chalk Talk
60% at least
when you consider at least one opposing big is helping, not in block-out position.
Of those 3 missed layups, 2 were rebounded by KU, for 67%. SSS is especially true for this, but it jives with the 60+% rate claimed by Self.*
I’d say this “jibes” more than it “jives” – coach Bill isn’t one to just blow smoke when explaining what goes on in the paint.
RRROOOOCK CHAAAALLLK! JAAAAYYYHAAAAWWWK! KAAAAYYY UUuuuUU!

by 













