Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Players Ready To Welcome Gay Teammate

Kansas Football Report Card: McNeese State

Photo

The Jayhawks beat McNeese State the way they're supposed to beat an FCS opponent.  At least, that's what the scoreboard says.  This game was never really in doubt, but it hardly inspired high marks across the board.  Obviously, there are plenty of high marks to go around on the offensive side of the ball, but the defense was another story.  I really do hate to pick the team apart after a win, especially with the so few to speak of in the past year, but...well, that's exactly what I'm about to do.

Star-divide

 

Quarterbacks - B

Webb wasn't asked to do much, but for the most part he made plays when he had to.  He did a fantastic job of executing the zone read, kept the offense moving at a quick pace that frequently caught McNeese State off guard, and connected on 7 of 10 passes for nearly 150 yards and 3 touchdowns.  No passes were forced, and there was no sign of the "WTF passes" we saw all to often last year.  The only things keeping Webb from getting an A are the ill-advised 4th quarter sack and, believe it or not, the first TD pass to Jacorey Shepherd.  A 56 yard TD pass looks great in the box score, but in reality, the pass was intended for a wide open Kale Pick.  Granted, Webb was rolling to his left on the play, but the ball has terribly underthrown, and Pick was really wide open.  Fortunately, Shepherd was nearby and reached out to make a fingertip grab as Pick tried to come back to the ball.  A great result, but it was nearly an incomplete pass when all Webb had to do was throw the ball anywhere near the open man.

 

Running Backs - A

All these high grades have to be take with a grain of salt this week, given the opponent, but there was still no way I could give this group anything less than an "A."  James Sims showed great vision on his way to a 100+ yard game, but the real excitement was delivered by two true freshmen.  Darrian Miller didn't break off any huge runs, but showed both the ability to dart around and escape tacklers, and an ability to lower his head and drive the pile.  Not a combination you see in many backs, especially not those standing only 5'10, 190 pounds.  Tony Pierson showed his playmaking ability right away, and ended up with 73 yards on just five carries, highlighted by a 47 yard TD run that looked simply effortless.

 

Wide Receivers/Tight Ends - B+

Truthfully, the receivers didn't have to do much to earn this grade.  Jacorey Shepherd had the most notable day of this group, with 107 yards and a pair of TDs, but the receivers also did their job in the running game.  Pick and Beshears are notably tenacious blockers downfield.  Biere had little involvement statistically, which is probably expected of the tight end when the team runs on 85% of its plays.  The only reason I don't give them an A is because, outside of Shepherd, they basically just did what was expected of them, though it was more than enough to keep the offense rolling.

 

Offensive Line - A+

The size of the McNeese defensive front has a lot to do with this grade, as does the fact that I would have been overjoyed just to see competent o-line play from the Jayhawks.  Still, I really wanted to give an A+ to someone, because this will likely be my only chance to do so.  Webb had time make his reads, and the running backs had seams and holes to run through all night long.  Granted, this what a BCS conference team should be expected to do to an FCS opponent in the trenches every time out, but the bottom line is they did it, and it was really fun to watch.

 

Overall Offensive Grade - B+

The offense did everything we needed them to do.  They scored quickly a few times, but generally dominated an outmatched team and methodically imposed their will.  They didn't light up the scoreboard the way the '07 and '08 teams could, so an "A" probably isn't justified, but seeing the offense work their gameplan and push around a defense was a welcome sight.

Defensive Line - D

Ok, that's enough good vibes for now.  The defensive front did not do their job Saturday night.  I realize that in the 3-4, the d-line is not necessarily expected to penetrate and disrupt, but it would be nice to see them beat their blocker when going one-on-one every now and then.  Keba Agostinho was a pleasant surprise, and found himself in the Cowboys' backfield several times, even sacking the QB once.  Outside of that, however, there wasn't much to be happy about here.  In the line's defense, McNeese had virtually zero success running the ball, so they have to get some share of the credit for that.  In the pass game, however, there was little or no push from the line, and blitzing linebackers were routinely picked up by available blockers.  This is not a good sign.

 

Linebackers - C

It's hard to give the entire unit a grade here, because they did some things very well, and others very poorly.  For instance, Toben Opurum was a problem for the McNeese State blockers all night.  He recorded a sack, 3.5 tackles for loss, and two QB hurries.  Steven Johnson was all over the field and ended up with 15 tackles.  On the other side of things, while Darius Willis consistently got around blockers and found himself near the play, he also routinely overpursued and ran past the play.  He looks like someone for whom the college game is still going pretty fast, which is understandable given that this was only his fourth time playing in a college game.  Tunde Bakare looked like a bit of a weak tackler a couple of times, and the unit as a whole had trouble getting to the outside on screen passes and check-downs.  There is definitely talent in this group, but this game brought some weaknesses to the surface as well.

 

Secondary - F

I'm not sure I can adequately describe the secondary's play without violating the site's Terms of Service, but I'll give it a shot.  Our DBs are terrible.  Barfield and Brown have no idea how to play a ball in the air, and as a result are usually content to simply watch their man catch it, and tackle him afterward.  This, combined with 5+ yard cushions, resulted in short gains through the air being readily available to McNeese State any time they wanted them.  This problem was also compounded by some terrible pursuit angles, especially by Patmon and the safeties, which allowed short gains to be extended to first downs.  Do you know why we have two converted receivers with virtually no defensive experience starting at safety?  Neither do I, but I know it isn't because they're too good to be kept off the field.  McDougald and Terry simply looked out of place every time they needed to help over the top on a deep pass, and Terry specifically was torched on a 32 yard TD pass by a receiver who looked like he runs about as fast as I do.  Now, I know Terry has speed, which leads me to believe he simply is not comfortable being in coverage in the open field.  This gives me hope that Terry will get better as time goes on, but let's pray the improvement happens sooner rather than later. 

And please, no blaming this on the lack of a pass rush.  I know that DB play looks worse when the QB has extra time to throw, but Saturday it didn't matter if he had two seconds to pass or ten...he was going to have receivers open.  You also can't blame the pass rush when DBs take a terrible angle on a ballcarrier or try to tackle them up around the shoulder pads (lookin' at you, McDougald).  The secondary was horrendous Saturday night, and since it has been horrendous since the day Aqib Talib went to Tampa Bay, I look for this to continue to be a weak spot as the season goes on.

 

Defense Overall - D

The only reason the defense doesn't get an F is that they were able to tighten up and get some stops when it counted.  As a whole, however, they tackled poorly, took bad angles, had problems getting to the QB, couldn't knock down a pass, and just generally allowed a weak opponent to march up and down the field on them to the tune of 420 yards.

 

Special Teams - D

Special Teams didn't hurt us too bad last night, but if we continue to play this way it will.  The blocking on kickoffs was poor, and DJ rarely found himself with room to run.  Mueller didn't attempt a field goal, and made all his PATs, but several were perilously low and could easily have been blocked.  The tackling by the kick coverage team was terrible, and they allowed 25 yards/return, including a 45 yard return that featured several whiffs by KU defenders.  On the bright side of things, Mueller did a serviceable job on kickoffs, getting a couple all the way to the end zone.  Ron Doherty seems to have a pretty solid leg as well, booting one of his two punts 49 yards on the fly, with no return.  The long snapping has also improved with Gibas taking over, as there were no bad snaps in any of the six PATs or two punts.

 

Coaching - C

This was hard to measure.  The staff clearly had the team ready to play this time.  Outside of a couple isolated communication errors (which happen to everyone), there were no signs of the disorganization and slow playcalling that hampered Kansas early on last year.  In fact, KU was able to hustle to the line quickly enough to catch McNeese State sleeping a couple of times.  Still, the team showed some troubling tendencies.  The defense as a whole did a poor job of tackling low, and as a result, there were many occasions where the first man to the ballcarrier had to simply try and slow him up until help arrived.  This was also prevalent on the kick coverage team.  The special teams play continues to leave much to be desired, which largely falls back on the coaching, which was lacking in this area last year as well.  The offensive playcalling was sound, and I was pleased to see them continue to pound the ball on the ground repeatedly.  Too often, coaches will outsmart themselves trying to switch things up and keep a defense on their toes, even if what they're already doing is working.  The run game was dominating, so we didn't deviate, which was good to see.


Overall Team Grade - C

The quality of the play varied so widely depending on which unit was on the field that it's nearly impossible to give the cohesive team a single grade.  With that in mind, I'm going down the middle with a "C."  The offense was every bit as good as the defense was bad, and the coaching was a bit of a wash.  Regardless of the grade, the Kansas Football team is 1-0, with hope for the future.

Poll
How would you rate the Jayhawks' overall performance against McNeese State?
A
6 votes
B
107 votes
C
83 votes
D
11 votes
F
4 votes

211 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 19 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Grades for 9/3/11

PenHawk – B+
Not out of line anywhere, spot on several places.
Good Job overall.

RRROOOOCK CHAAAALLLK! JAAAAYYYHAAAAWWWK! KAAAAYYY UUuuuUU!

by KU62 on Sep 5, 2011 9:56 AM CDT reply actions  

I'd give the team a B-

I think you were too hard on the special teams as I would definitely give them a B. Our kick coverage was good to start the game and went down hill in the second half. Our punts got plenty of hang time and distance. The PATs went through the uprights so there’s that.

I also noticed that when we played man-to-man coverage our corners actually did pretty well which at least warrants a D instead of an F. Also, we were victims of a really good game plan. Our own players admitted in post-game interviews that a lot of the plays McNeese ran were not on the scouting report because they didn’t run them last year. McNeese wanted to run the ball on us like they did against their opponents last season and our LBs and DL did not allow it. They went to the screen pass which forces our outside LB to cover the screen instead of blitzing or rushing the passer off the edge and which in turn give the QB ample time to throw deep when they need to. The 3-4 definitely has some weaknesses. Just look at our game vs. GT last year. We used screen passes quite a bit and they worked pretty well for us too.

by trueKUblue on Sep 5, 2011 11:13 AM CDT reply actions   1 recs

+1

It’s tough to do much analysis “watching the game” on the radio, but it would seem hard to grade ST’s in particular below average if they do most what they are suppose to do. Maybe the kick coverage could be better, but otherwise they did what they are supose to do. No extra points for height on extra points, tho it does warrant mentioning as a warning for the future.

Not sure of all of the analysis for the D, but was encouraged that we shut down what was suppose to be a solid ground game. That’s half the battle.

by dagger108 on Sep 5, 2011 12:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

Agree with all this

B- seems right to me too

Shit happens when you win championships

by Andrew Clark on Sep 5, 2011 2:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

too hard on the secondary

there’s only so much they can do when the majority of mcneese’s gains are on short screen passes, the front 7 needs to have better recognition on those to try and contain it.

next level performer

by Gippp on Sep 5, 2011 12:38 PM CDT reply actions  

I graded down the LBs for the screen passes as well

but the secondary has been allowing short to mid-range passes ad nauseum for years. Perhaps my growing frustration with these tendencies caused me to be a little harder on them than necessary.

On the other hand, they did have plenty of opportunities to try and knock a thrown ball away only to sit back and wait for the receiver to catch it, and the safeties were terrible when helping out on deeper throws. Add in the extra yards their backs and receivers got due to the entire back seven taking terrible pursuit angles, and I’m not sure my negativity was really unwarranted.

No touching!

by PenHawk on Sep 5, 2011 1:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

yeah

i need access to a replay in the worst way, i was at the game but in a fairly altered state

next level performer

by Gippp on Sep 5, 2011 1:59 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'd like to see a replay as well

I was at the game too, but sitting at about the 10 yard line. I’d like to see just how the blame should be spread on some of those short passes. Whether it was the LBs or the secondary, bottom line is that the pass defense must improve.

No touching!

by PenHawk on Sep 5, 2011 2:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

The secondary was bad, but the LB's coverage was aweful

Their running backs would trickle out of the backfield for screens and check-downs and NOBODY was picking them up.

Seems like we are employing way too much of a “bend but don’t break” defense, which makes no sense, because we still give up the occasional big pass play anyways…

You can use a bend but don’t break strategy if you have confidence that you will eventually get a sack, turnover, big play, etc and stop the drive. Early Mangino teams did this a lot because we always had a few playmakers on D (Charles Gordon, Charelton Keith, Nick Reid, Talib later, etc) that would eventually step up and make a play.

We don’t have that on defense at the moment. We need to be more aggressive.

Shit happens when you win championships

by Andrew Clark on Sep 5, 2011 2:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

vealy mentioned

in post game that mcneese showed a new, fairly nuanced screen game that likely won’t be seen again all year. still not sure if that’s just them saving face or not, won’t be sure until i see a replay.

next level performer

by Gippp on Sep 5, 2011 2:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

it's important

as an enlightened society that we find the correct unit to blame and then proceed to shit all over them

next level performer

by Gippp on Sep 5, 2011 3:16 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

I like this statement.

Glad I came, just wish I hadn't stayed so long.
Rock Chalk Talk

by Warden11 on Sep 6, 2011 8:04 AM CDT up reply actions  

"Granted, this what a BCS conference team should be expected to do to an FCS opponent in the trenches every time out"

::starts thinking of North Dakota State game and starts breaking shit::

Shit happens when you win championships

by Andrew Clark on Sep 5, 2011 2:37 PM CDT reply actions  

Also, I think all the grades are spot on

Penhawk making it rain.

Shit happens when you win championships

by Andrew Clark on Sep 5, 2011 2:42 PM CDT reply actions  

Pass coverage

Defense has to get better. LBs have to do a better job of watching backs in flat. Secondary for yet another year CLEARLY give too much cushion to wideouts.
Offense efficient and with play action Webb will do better.

by jhawki on Sep 5, 2011 3:10 PM CDT reply actions  

I've given a lot of thought to the cushion issue

and I don’t really understand it. It seems to me that if you’re going to get beat deep anyway, there isn’t much point to backing off the LOS. You might as well be there to make the tackle if a short pass or screen is thrown.

Still, there has to be a reason that I’m not seeing. We’ve been using this strategy since the Mangino/Bowen years. It’s just frustrating since it seems like you could give Barfield and Brown a 20 yard cushion, and they still can’t stop their man from catching a deep pass.

No touching!

by PenHawk on Sep 5, 2011 5:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

Nice article

I look forward to reading more of them as the season goes along. I hope the grades stay up…

by sax solo on Sep 6, 2011 7:32 AM CDT reply actions  

I voted D

But C- is probably what I’d vote if it were an option.

C seems a little too high, because I look at a C performance as 6 win/bowl caliber. And the team we saw on Saturday could not win 6 games.

I’d say your OL grade is too high, because of course it is, but your explanation validated it for me.

by hiphopopotamus on Sep 6, 2011 9:28 AM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Rock Chalk Talk is your independent source for Jayhawk sports news, information and conversation on the web. Our goal is to provide Kansas Jayhawk fans a diverse, fair and public forum to talk Kansas sports.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Big XII has golden opportunity
Small
Power Ranking the Big East Teams
Small
Power Ranking the SEC Football Teams
Small
Dan Devine 101-30 at mizzou and don faurot 113-63 at mizzou
Small
Power Ranking the Big 12 Football Teams
Small
Best Conference Realignment Scenarios
Photo_small
RCT Beer Review: Summer Honey
Mario_small
RCT Mailbag Reminder!
Small
Kansas Basketball Recruiting Chart
Small
Marquis Jackson moves to running back

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Rock Chalk Talk on Facebook

Owen Kemp and Rock Chalk Talk on Twitter


Managing Editor

Rctfinalcircusstepdown_2_small Owen

Assistant Editor

Wardenhatcopy_small Warden11

Mario_small fetch9

Contributing Authors

Small hiphopopotamus

Todd_small ajanzen

David_stuff_small PenHawk

Small KU Grad 08