Kansas Football Report Card: Northern Illinois
Another Kansas victory, and it followed the same basic formula as the first. Win the LOS battle on offense, put up a bunch of points, and hope the opposition can't keep up. It's not perfect, but so far it's worked. Not a lot of changes to the grades this week, as it felt like basically the same performance as in week one, just with better competition.
Quarterbacks - A-
Webb didn't do anything jaw-dropping, but I still felt compelled to put him in the "A" range. He threw a couple of passes just beyond the reach of receivers, and failed to fall on his fumble when he had the opportunity, but overall he was instrumental in the victory. He set a new career high in yards and tossed three TD passes, including the game winner. After watching Webb last year, who could have guessed he would have a 6:0 TD:int ratio through two games?
Running Backs - A
Hard to rate them lower than an A when they get 255 yards on 48 carries (5.31 ypc). When you factor in that they had roughly 120 yards worth of TD runs called back on unnecessary penalties, they look even better. All four of the main backs looked solid, and Rell Lewis even got in on the action early on.
Wide Receivers/Tight Ends - B
The receivers made plays when they needed to. KU was able to pick up 12 first downs through the air, many of which came on crucial third down conversions. The blocking on the outside was outstanding as well. The only thing holding them back from an "A" were a couple of holding penalties and dropped passes.
Offensive Line - A-
This is what we were hoping from the line last year. Kansas controlled the line of scrimmage offensively, and by the end of the game had worn down the Huskies and were imposing their will on every play. Jeff Spikes had a little trouble keeping DE Alan Baxter out of the backfield, the only thing holding the unit back from an A+.
Overall Offensive Grade - A
I'm trying to keep this shorter than last week's report card, so I'll put it simply. Hard to argue with 534 yards and 45 points.
Defensive Line - F
I know some of you will say I'm being too hard on the defense today, and it's possible I'm so sick of seeing the same problems that I'm being too critical, but I think the line play was abysmal. You can't give any D1 quarterback all day to make decisions, and when that QB is Chandler Harnish, you're in that much more trouble. The D was able to limit the running backs' productivity, but Harnish had lanes as wide as K-10 to run through when he turned it upfield, and wasn't sacked once. In fact, KU didn't record a single QB hurry.
Linebackers - D+
The lack of presence in the opposing backfield begins with the d-line, but doesn't end there. The linebackers share some blame in allowing 90 rushing yards to the quarterback, as well as our inability to defend screens and short passes. The pursuit angles didn't look quite as bad as they did last week, specifically in the case of Darius Willis. The only thing saving them from an F is 4 TFL from the linebacking crew, and the fact that NIU's running backs averaged only 3.4 yards per carry.
Secondary - F
I'm not backing off the DBs. I know the lack of a pass rush is pulling down their performance, but you can't blame the pass rush for the inability to defend a pass when you have proper positioning. The coaching staff also bears some blame for this F. We've all been saying this for years, but come on...it's time to ditch the 10 yard cushions. We can't defend the screen and we get beat deep anyway. The corners are solid tacklers, so bring them up to the line and let them disrupt the short passing game. Harnish was 27-33, which is 84% if you take out the prayer on the last second play. For the year, we're allowing a 78.3% completion rate.
Overall Defensive Grade - D
I was going to give them an F, but the defense's bottom line is to allow few enough points to win the game, and they did that.
Special Teams - B
Mueller missed his only field goal, but it was nice to see he had plenty of leg on a 49 yarder. The only punt of the day went 56 yards, which is great. The kick coverage unit gave up only about 18 yards/return, which is also very good. The only part I wasn't pleased with was the lack of running room DJ frequently found himself trying to overcome. The 50 yard return on the last driver sure was nice, though.
Coaching - C+
Is the lack of defense a coaching problem, or a talent problem? That's almost impossible to answer, since poor talent can render any coaching staff's decisions futile, and poor coaching can disguise hidden talent on the field. Either way, there's a problem, and it isn't being fixed at this point. Offensively, it's hard to argue with the results, and special teams seem to have improved greatly from last year.
Overall Team Grade - C+
We won, so I'll give them a plus. Once again, it was a tale of two teams. The offensive was borderline-dominant, and the defense was borderline-dominated. A win's a win, but I don't know that this type of performance will lead to many wins now that we're getting into the BCS-level opponents.
27 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Good Analysis
Agree with the Defence flirting with a F. As mistake prone as KU was, the result was an A as I just want to keep winning.
First miss was nearly 50 yeards too
Shit happens when you win championships
by Andrew Clark on Sep 12, 2011 7:07 PM CDT up reply actions
Glad to hear of what sounds like real improvement by Jordan Webb
We’ve got enough weapons on offense that we should be able to stay in a lot of games and steal some as long as we get good QB play. He’s always had the arm, it was always just about getting quicker with the reads and improving his accuracy. We’ll have to see how that holds up once he goes against Big XII d-lines, but it sounds like there’s reason to be hopeful (at least about our offense).
Something that hasn’t happened since 2008 – if you go to the CF stats page for ESPN, the 4th highest QB efficiency rating so far belongs to Webb, and one of the guys ahead of him has only played one game (although, that guy is RGIII, so…nuff’ said).
by 2.1 seconds left on Sep 12, 2011 11:19 AM CDT reply actions
Knew he was 2 in the conference
but 4 in the nation is crazy. Even crazier tho is Denard Robinson being around the top 10 with a 45% comp% and a TD:INT of about 1. Not quite sure how that works.
defemse
Where’s the 05 defense when we need them? I believe they were ranked in the top 10 most of the season for their performance. Our offense is doing great but seriously our defense needs to improve a lot. I mean our offense isn’t going to continue to play the way their playing in every single game. So our defense needs to step it up a notch. Other wise teams like OU UT and etc will blow us out with no problem.
e arterbery
by e jayhawk on Sep 12, 2011 11:44 AM CDT via mobile reply actions
2007 defense was better to me (barely)
Played higher level offenses that year. All my opinion though. Thought that defense had a little more speed. Although 2005 had a legit difference maker in Keith at DE. That guy was a monster.
Shit happens when you win championships
by Andrew Clark on Sep 12, 2011 7:09 PM CDT up reply actions
Good, honest assessment
from this fan’s POV. The LB play was especially disappointing given the talk about increased speed and the fact that a 6’2" 220lb QB was able to run for so many yards. Robert Griffin has to have a circle around our date with Baylor.
I don't understand the D line grad
The D Line’s job in the 3-4 is to tie up blockers…not to rush the qb. That job falls to the LBs. Yet you seem to ding the Dline for no sacks or hurries? You’re going to be dinging them forever as long as we run a 3-4. It’s not their primary responsibility.
That doesn’t make sense to me.
"No time for questions. No time for games. Start kickin' ass and takin' down the names." - Dave Mustaine.
Yes, but if they're really tying up the blockers...
the LBs can’t help but to make plays. Sadly, I didn’t see the game. But I anticipate it looked much like week 1. And in week 1, the DL was atrocious.
by hiphopopotamus on Sep 12, 2011 12:48 PM CDT up reply actions
Clarification...
I shouldn’t say that they can’t help but to “make plays,” but rather to be “in the plays.” Maybe that happened this week, but it didn’t against McNeese.
by hiphopopotamus on Sep 12, 2011 12:53 PM CDT up reply actions
Part of the problem with the LB's
is even when they do get free they have a tendancy to over-persue. Say what you will about Bill Young’s up and down defenses, the one thing they did consistantly was play excellent contain.
If this defense wants to play conservative and set up to eliminate the big play, the OLB’s and SS’s need to play better contain, that way a good running QB when the play breaks down only picks up 3-4 yards instead of 20.
If you can't say anything nice, don't say anything at all.
Bill Young
may have been the best coordinator in Kansas football history. He’s definitely missed the most.
Young's defenses were very well coached on the field
Lack of penalties and an ability to force turnovers were the key. Our defense still hasn’t figured out a way to create a turnover or two a game, and it is hurting.
Shit happens when you win championships
by Andrew Clark on Sep 12, 2011 7:10 PM CDT up reply actions
This
is frustrating the hell out of me. I haven’t been able to watch a game yet: our we just not trying to strip the ball, or are we just not doing it?
"No time for questions. No time for games. Start kickin' ass and takin' down the names." - Dave Mustaine.
we're trying so desperately to catch
up to make a tackle that stripping the ball or lining up a big hit just isn’t in the cards
If you can't say anything nice, don't say anything at all.
We are giving such a big cushion that teams are dinking and dunking
Not much of a chance at a pick when the other team is throwing quick slants and bubble screens. So some of it is our scheme. Although Terry had a shot at a pick with two jump balls, yet somehow the receiver caught one (for a touchdown) and the other one was initially ruled a catch then it was determined the WR lost control when hitting the ground.
Fumbles, I don’t know. A lot of that can be luck but I have yet to see the other team even put it on the ground.
We are going to need to start getting some if we want to compete the rest of the way. Webb, while playing very well, is going to throw some picks (he is only a sophomore) and we have a lot of true freshman backs seeing PT, not to mention our young WRs. Point being, our offense isn’t going to remain perfect forever. Plus, forcing a few can help you upset a team (see our GTech win last year).
It has definitely been frustrating, but hopefully its just been some bad luck so far…
Shit happens when you win championships
by Andrew Clark on Sep 12, 2011 9:18 PM CDT up reply actions
It would seem that forced F's & INT's
would be skills to work on after getting consistent playing D. It is still a young/new D.
Defense tried to strip the ball on run plays
But passing is a whole other animal. Not getting enough pressure on the QB and rushing to catch up with wide-open receivers.
We're even have the 2 leading TOF players (players) in conference.
and 3 LB’s are well ranked in overall tackles.
Agree that it is a little disturbing for their QB to be their leading rusher, but glad we agan shutdown the RB’s. Regardless of the QB’s size, he was previewed to be a QB with decent even if not world class wheels.
One reason why we have so many tackles...
Is our defense is on the field a lot. You can wrack up 5 tackles a quarter easily when the other team is constantly putting together 80 yard drives.
Shit happens when you win championships
by Andrew Clark on Sep 12, 2011 7:11 PM CDT up reply actions
actually
we dominated time of possession agains NIU…
If you can't say anything nice, don't say anything at all.
Which actually just shows how quickly they scored on us
sigh
Shit happens when you win championships
by Andrew Clark on Sep 12, 2011 9:13 PM CDT up reply actions
20 T/G would lead the nation
Even Johnson at 10 tpg is higly regarded. They have been running a lot of plays lately. I’m recalling Gill talking about it after the first game.
it's basically been said
but even in the 3-4, the pass rush starts with the d-line. We’re blitzing linebackers with some regularity this year, and they’re being met by waiting linemen at the line of scrimmage. That means that the d-line is not tying up blockers, which doesn’t even giving the blitz a chance to work.
Correct
We don’t have a d-lineman that demands a double team. So do the math, 3 d-lineman & 5 o-lineman = 2 o-lineman left to take backers. If we had a true threat in a pass rush on the d-line we would have significantly more luck. Also, it doesn’t help when the opposing offense is running quick pass plays out to the flats, less time to reach the qb.
by P. J. Karasek on Sep 13, 2011 1:14 PM CDT up reply actions

by 













