A QB Hypothetical
For the second consecutive season, Quinn Mecham and Jordan Webb are locked in competition for the Jayhawks' starting QB spot. While I hope whomever is picked to start does well, I'm realistic enough to realize that unless these guys have improved by leaps and bounds in one offseason, we're likely to still be debating who deserves the title of QB1 throughout the season. So if the staff is forced to make a switch, who's the best option?
The most obvious solution would be to replace the starter with the guy who he was competing with all spring. Both Webb and Mecham had flashes where they looked like D1-caliber QBs (GT for Webb, 4th quarter of Colorado for Mecham), so giving the other guy a shot seems reasonable if the starter struggles.
However, I think the timing of this kind of switch would be pivotal to whether it would be the best move for the staff to make. Ideally, I would like to see whoever comes out of camp as the starter to get 2 or 3 games before any switch is seriously considered. If the guy looks truly awful you could pull him sooner, but when developing a young QB, you have to realize there will be growing pains. Pulling a guy too soon can shake his confidence and make the new guy feel that he is one step away from getting yanked, too.
If we are late into the season, I think the staff should lean toward staying with or switching to Webb, depending on who the starter is at the time. Mecham is a senior, so even if he comes in and wins a game or two, next year we are back to square one. If we're 3 games or so from the end of the year, I think riding it out with Webb is the best option, because best case, the switch finally flips and he is the guy next year and worst case, he continues to struggle, and the staff can move on and give Berglund and Cummings more reps next spring.
There is also the chance that the staff burns the redshirt of Berglund or Cummings. While I am almost always in favor of redshirting QBs, if one of these guys comes in and impresses in fall camp, the coaches might be inclined to give them some game experience, so they are further along in their development next season, when KU has a more realistic chance of competing.
This is probably what most fans will be calling for if the starting QB struggles, but it's definitely a risky move. If the pass blocking of the O-line hasn't improved significantly from last season, it could easily cause BB or Cummings to develop ‘happy feet', and while both known for their mobility, a QB needs to learn to pass first and run only when there are no other options. We've all seen what poor protection can do to a QB (David Carr is the first example that comes to mind), so I'm a little weary of this type of scenario until there is some tangible improvement up front. And while there are success stories coming from situations like this, (most notably Todd Reesing) those are outnumbered by young guys coming in too soon and getting pummeled by defenders who have the benefit of at least a year of college level playing experience and strength training.
If this were the route the staff chooses to take, I would want it to happen as soon as possible. It's not worth burning a guy's redshirt for only a couple of games, but if we are only a game or two into the Big XII schedule, and the coaches believe one of the freshmen is ready to step in, I'd be fine with that kind of move.
The last scenario, which is probably the least likely to happen, is to give Jablonksi a chance to win the QB spot. It's not often that a walk-on succeeds as a BCS-level QB, but by all accounts Jablonksi looked every bit as good as Webb and Mecham during the spring game. Granted the spring game is little more than a single practice, but if we're assuming that whoever the beginning of the season starter was has already performed miserably; why not give the guy a shot? Worst case, he shows everyone why he was a walk-on in the first place, and best case, he shows that the spring game was more than just a flash in the pan.
This is the option that I'd be most in favor of, mainly because it's a low-risk, high-reward move. If Jablonski turns out to be no better than Webb and Mecham, Berglund and Cummings still have their redshirts, and no one is left wondering what could've been. And if Jablonski comes in and lights it up, while we might have a QB battle of a different type next season (whether to play a successful walk-on versus two highly thought of scholarship players), I think we'd all take that type of a competition versus the "who do we think will suck less" kind of competition we are having now.
14 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Here is my take
1)“I think the staff should lean toward staying with or switching to Webb, depending on who the starter is at the time. Mecham is a senior, so even if he comes in and wins a game or two, next year we are back to square one. If we’re 3 games or so from the end of the year, I think riding it out with Webb is the best option, because best case, the switch finally flips and he is the guy next year and worst case, he continues to struggle, and the staff can move on and give Berglund and Cummings more reps next spring”
This has been my thinking as well. Webb is younger. I play him because he can develop more. Mecham is an experienced backup.
2) Unless Berglund wins the job in camp, he should not play next year. Look, we aren’t going to be good. Period. Plus, Gill and his staff are going to get a third year. We aren’t winning games, no need to burn his redshirt unless he is going to play 75% of the snaps at least (then he’d be getting great experience).
Mangino had to burn Reesing’s redshirt to save a salvagable season (KU was 3-4 at that point, they had winnable games left against ISU and KSU which they did win, etc) and to save his job. That won’t be the case next year.
3) Given my take on number two, and if/when we are losing and have a crap record, I wouldn’t mind giving Jablonski at shot if he has looked good in practice.
Overall, Webb will be our starter when the season starts. Basically, it is his time to prove to the staff he can be the guy. If, after 3 or more games, it is apparent he isn’t the guy, you have to make the tough choice:
Do you ride out Webb and just hope he keeps getting good experience for the future (after all he is only a sophomore)
Do you pull a redshirt on Berglund and let him finish the year (like I said, I’m not in favor of doing this unless it is done early in the year)
Do you play Jablonski because he is a RS freshman and is also a future option (depends on how he does in practice and if the coaches think he has potential to be a future starter)
Do you announce a “transfer” from Europe who just arrived to play ball (aka Todd Reesing with a very thick beard, tattoos, and other disguise options)
Shit happens when you win championships
Anyone remember Rodd Teesing
KennyGregoryRockThaCradle’s theory that Todd Reesing had been replaced by a Wario-like twin? Maybe that could work (in regards to my last option in my post above)
He looked like this:

Shit happens when you win championships
by Andrew Clark on May 25, 2011 7:27 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
That's better than Colt McMustache

www.oreadboomkings.fantake.com
If you can't give the nod to someone comfortably by fall camp...
then don’t burn a redshirt because the team is most likely going to be mediocre at best. Would you have sacrificed a sub .500 record in 2006 to have Todd Reesing one more year? Not sure it fixes everything but I sure would have….I think.
Questions, Comments? email me at denverjhawk@hotmail.com
That example is hairy
Because if we don’t beat CU, and finish say 4-8 that year… not sure if Mangino is around for what happened next. KU would have had a good team the next year and won at least 9 games… but not sure they make the Orange Bowl…
But hey thats a whole nother debate.
Apart from that, though, I certainly agree. Burning a redshirt should only be done if the guy is going to play at least 2/3rds of the season, or if it is necessary due to injury (and even then there are extenuating circumstances)
Shit happens when you win championships
by Andrew Clark on May 25, 2011 8:57 PM CDT up reply actions
And if Reesing doesn't get that experience
then he probably doesn’t have as good a year as he did in 2007. Even if, I’m not sure Reesing could have saved last season’s sinking ship.
www.oreadboomkings.fantake.com
I'm not sure about that
Remember, Reesing saw maybe a game’s worth of action in 2006. I’m sure that game-time action did help, but I’m not sure if it made that big of a difference (see my comment below for further analysis)
Shit happens when you win championships
by Andrew Clark on May 26, 2011 8:36 AM CDT up reply actions
Any experience helps.
And the point remains the same. Even if Reesing hadn’t pulled his redshirt, he wouldn’t have been a lot of help to last years team.
Win now, worry about the future later.
www.oreadboomkings.fantake.com
The CU game DEFINITELY helped Todd
On his first snap, he learned that staring down a WR leads to an INT.
On his 3rd (?) snap he learned he was quick enough to scramble out of trouble for a big gain.
On his 5th (?) snap he leared that if he tries to run over a DT, he will lose and likely fumble the ball (which he did).
Valuable lessons there in that one game.
build a damn football program, beat some ass, and get on tv more.
I would certainly hope to avoid burning a redshirt
because I think QB is second only to the line positions in regards to the jump in the level of difficulty from high school to college. But if Webb (who I think we are all assuming will hold of Mecham at this point) struggles, there will certainly be a very large and very vocal portion of the fanbase that will be calling for Berglund.
The major difference with Reesing/Meier and the current QB situation is that the ‘06 team looked like it was only a step or two away from being a pretty complete team, something that we likely won’t be saying about this year’s team. But if early on the team looks good, but QB play is clearly holding us back, I wouldn’t mind seeing Berglund, but I wouldn’t necessarily be happy about it.
As a side note: If Reesing’s redshirt doesn’t get pulled in ’06, what does our ’07 season look like? I doubt we go to the Orange Bowl, but there is a chance we achieve similar levels of success in ’08. Interesting to think about.
Its a juicy debate
A lot of factors to consider:
1) How much did the action Reesing saw in 2006 (however little it was) help him in 2007? Was it enough to get him confident and ready for 2007? Remember, he played a half against Colorado, a half against Mizzou and maybe 10 snaps against Iowa State. Or did this not really matter, since Reesing beat Meier out in camp?
2) If Reesing didn’t see action in 2006, does he beat out Meier in camp? Perhaps seeing Reesing in game action, however little it was, helped the staff give him the job.
3) If Reesing doesn’t play against Colorado, KU likely loses that game. Does Mangino still have a job?
4) If Reesing redshirts, how does he shape last year’s team? Is there a better locker room with him running the show? I say KU at the very least beats North Dakota State, and possibly picks up another league win (Iowa State maybe, we only lost that one by 10 and it was Mecham’s first game).
If Reesing had redshirted all the way through 2006, I still think the team is special in 2007. He really didn’t see that much time in 2006. He beat out Meier in camp, and he got better as 2007 progressed (look at this stats against KState compared to his numbers later in the year against, say, Oklahoma State). Don’t forget our defense was very good that year, and we had a monster running game. I feel like even if Meier had QBed us in 2007, we still likely would have gone 9-3 or 10-2 at worst. Team was too good in all other areas and the schedule was too favorable.
Shit happens when you win championships
by Andrew Clark on May 26, 2011 8:34 AM CDT up reply actions
burning the redsirt is problematic if
there aren’t more recruits coming behind. More of a problem with MM than it appears to be with Coach Gill. Play the best and recruit even better.

by 














