Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Ray Allen Fighting Age, Injury And His New Role

The Great Fan Debate: Tyshawn Taylor Vs. Elijah Johnson

When Tyshawn moved to the bench due to suspension and EJ filled in with a 15 point performance in a Kansas win, the debate was on.  Whether it be here at Rock Chalk Talk, in the seats at Allen Fieldhouse or the Jayhawk Barber Shop the Kansas fan base had a question on their collective mind and that was T2 V EJ. 

The good news is that we don't have to answer the question entirely because they both play for Kansas and Bill Self has both at their disposal.  Still it's natural to wonder which on provides the Jayhawks the better chance to win.  And that brings us to our first RCT Fan Debate featuring KG(Team EJ) vs. Penguin(Team Taylor).

Star-divide

Fbpic_medium

 

Penguinhawk(Team Taylor)

I'll start things off here by stating that Bill Self clearly believes that Tyshawn is the better player.  T2 has started 26 of his 27 games played this season, and averages 27.5 minutes per game.  By contrast, EJ averages 13.7 minutes and has two starts, one of which being entirely due to Tyshawn's suspension.  Let's face it, if Tyshawn doesn't get caught doing whatever he was doing, Johnson doesn't start last Monday and we don't even have this conversation.  

But back to my original point, Self wants Tyshawn in the game over Elijah.  About twice as much, if minutes played are any indication.  To say that Johnson is actually the better player is to claim that you know basketball better than Bill Self, whose resume I believe speaks for itself.

 

Be47719cc6c2628e92a90033e596c049_medium

KG(Team EJ)

Let me start off by making a few points: First, I don't think Elijah Johnson is ready for his bust in Springfield just yet.  I'm not ready to call him an All-American candidate or anything like that.  Secondly, although it may seem otherwise, I don't "hate" Tyshawn Taylor.  I do see some value from him, but I see it as a guy that can come off the bench, slash to the basket, and then head back out of the game before his inevitable loss of focus on defense leads to easy buckets for the opponent or even worse his play leads to fouls by other teammates who are trying to cover for him.

What this argument really is about is how the minutes between these two players should be doled out to give this team the best chance to win 6 games in March and April.  And, when I look at all the factors, I can't help but to conclude that it's time to see EJ as PG1.

That being said, you're right, Penguin.  HCBS has shown a lot of faith in Tyshawn Taylor the past three years.  Too much faith, in my opinion.  TT came to KU the year after Brandon Rush, Mario Chalmers, and Russel Robinson had left the program.  Kansas was looking extremely weak on the perimeter (except for Sherron), and Taylor was a Marquette recruit that just lost his coach.  It was a marriage of convenience that has been productive in the regular season, based upon win/loss record.  

However, correlation does not prove causation.  Kansas has been so loaded for so long that they are able to win games often in spite of Tyshawn, not because of him.  It's no secret that Coach Self places a lot of value in experience.  Taylor has been the incumbent ever since his freshman year, and only now faces a serious challenge to his starting role, despite his numerous off-the-court embarrassments and inconsistent performance on it.  And yet, with that built-in advantage, Taylor simply hasn't shown his past experience to be particularly helpful.  If you look at Tyshawn's basic statistics over his career, it's remarkable how they haven't really changed at all between his freshman season and this year. Maybe he's about to face the consequences of that by losing his starting spot.

And speaking of that, I find it odd that you think I'm claiming to be smarter than Bill Self, when he is the one now agreeing with me. "The ball is in his court" I believe is the phrase that HCBS used when describing Elijah's starting situation.  For the first time in his career on Monday night, Elijah was able to really show what he's capable of, and apparently won his coach over.  Maybe he wasn't ready to overtake Taylor until now.  Maybe he just never had a chance to prove what he's capable of out there.  Whatever it is, things have changed.  

Because even if Elijah can't play as well as he did against Okie State every night, even if Taylor is (wrongly) given his starting position back, EJ has now earned Self's trust- something only Robinson has also done in our last two recruiting classes.  That trust is going to allow EJ to play more relaxed, and that will pay dividends, because EJ is the better shooter, he's more athletic, and he's the better defender.  

Why hasn't Tyshawn Taylor improved in his time at Kansas?  What great asset does Tyshawn possess that is so critical to the success of this team that he must not be held accountable for that failure to do so?

 

Fbpic_medium

 

PenguinHawk

Wow.  Lots to address there.  I'll start with your last paragraph.  You say Taylor must be held accountable for his failure to improve.  Should we do so at the cost of the team?  While I concede that Taylor's numbers haven't shown dramatic growth over his time at KU, they are better than Johnson's.  If the argument was about who has the higher ceiling, I'd grant that EJ wins that competition.  But that's not what we're discussing.  The fact that EJ will likely be better in a year or two has no bearing on who should be playing right now.  Paul Pierce didn't improve dramatically between his years at KU.  Should Roy have sat him his sophomore year to "hold him accountable" for his failure to improve?

Right now, Tyshawn is better than Elijah.  You say Bill Self agrees with you about Johnson.  What, Self just happened to decide he favors EJ the same day Tyshawn got suspended?  Johnson is getting this chance because Tyshawn is unavailable, not because Self suddenly changed his mind 27 games into the season.  You mention Self's quote that "the ball is in his court."  Well of course it is, the starter can't play!  If EJ plays lights out until T2 is back, then Self can say he earned the right to continue playing.  If he plays like, well, himself, Coach can say he failed to seize the opportunity and give the job back to Tyshawn.  That's not an expression of confidence in Johnson, that's covering his bases.

Still, we can take Self's opinion out of this and Taylor is still on top.  Per 40 minutes played, Tyshawn averages more points, more assists, and more steals.  You can't argue with production.  Johnson's shooting has been better, but if you take away his lights-out performance against Okie State, his season eFG% drops from 62.7% to 57.9%.  That says two things: one, that his performance Monday was quite uncharacteristic.  Two, the sample size on his shooting is not significant enough to draw many conclusions from it.  One game added more than four to his season's percentage.  It also added 5.3% to his 3 point shooting on its own.  The game was an outlier for a player who, for good reason, is considered a mediocre shooter.  True, Johnson has committed fewer turnovers than Taylor, but all T2's minutes are on the ball as the point guard, whereas only a portion of EJ's are, so that's really not surprising.

Everyone is on the EJ bandwagon right now because Tyshawn has been the fanbase's choice scapegoat ever since Brady caught fire, and he's presented as the alternative.  Honestly, I hope Johnson plays like he did Monday from here on out and leads us to victory in April.  But let's face it, nothing in his history suggests he is more likely to do that than Tyshawn.  Tyshawn has played a total of 2502 minutes in his college career.  Johnson has played 507.  Self has started Tyshawn in 26 games this season.  Johnson has started twice, and one of those was due only to Taylor's suspension.  How does that add up to Elijah Johnson being Self's go-to guy?

At the end of the day, Taylor has been better than Johnson outside of one game in which Taylor did not get the chance to play.  I know we're tired of the dumb mistakes that T2 can, at times, be prone to.  But we shouldn't let that frustration lead us to preferring a player who performs at a lower level, is less trusted by the coach, and has some past character issues of his own.  Taylor has been the point guard, and should continue to be the point guard.

 

Be47719cc6c2628e92a90033e596c049_medium

 

KG

You're right, it was a lot to digest, so I'll try to keep this shorter.  First off, I have to address the Paul Pierce comparison.  Admit it, when you were writing that, you didn't honestly think that Tyshawn Taylor deserved to be mentioned in the same sentence as an NBA Finals MVP, Olympian, and future Hall of Famer.  A player that averages 20 ppg for three straight years obviously has more value than a guy that gives you 9 ppg.  

I'm also not sure why we need to focus so heavily on why EJ got his chance Monday night.  Isn't the much more important issue what he did with that chance?  Sure, EJ isn't going to shoot 100% every game, but he can play the type of defense he played against The Hobbit every game.  And since defense is the major weakness of this team, I believe EJ is the better option for the majority of the minutes.

Fundamentally, though, my question is this:  why shouldn't Taylor be required to earn his starting position back, when he, to be blunt, doesn't appreciate the opportunity that he's been given.  Yes, most of the stuff TT has gotten in trouble over have been relatively minor offenses.  And I'm not going to attack a 20 year old for (if the rumors are true) getting caught getting some nookie in the awesome Player's Lounge.  But Tyshawn has gone from screw-up to screw-up to screw-up...

We all know that certain players get more slack for their behavior because of their abilities on the court.  When Rush and Chalmers got busted with weed at the NBA Rookie Symposium, it wasn't exactly a shocking revelation to those of us that went to school with them.  But those guys were champions and far better players than Tyshawn, and were much better at keeping their private lives private.

If Taylor were an elite player, Self would be right in letting most of his nonsense slide.  But he just isn't, in any way.  It's time for the minutes distribution between the two to reflect that.

 

Fbpic_medium

 

PenguinHawk

To the Pierce analogy; obviously I wasn't putting Taylor on the same plane as Pierce as a basketball player.  I was simply making the point that you don't sit a better player to punish him for not developing the way you hoped he would.

It's interesting to me that our sticking point doesn't seem to be who the better player is.  I don't disagree that Taylor is not an elite player, or that Johnson ultimately has the higher ceiling.  I don't disagree that Taylor has screwed up several times in his career at KU (though let's not forget EJ's suspension either).  The bottom line is that Elijah Johnson is not as good as Tyshawn Taylor.  The numbers reflect that, as does the fact that Self has given Tyshawn twice as many minutes this year.

Not to sound too much like Dan Hawkins here, but this ain't intramurals, brother, it's the Big 12!  It's Division One basketball!  We're trying to win a national championship, and we don't have the luxury of sitting a player who gives us a better chance to win in order to make a statement about fully consensual sexual escapades.  Taylor has better production and five times the on-court experience that Johnson has.  You don't send him to the bench in March because sometimes he has the audacity to act like a 20-year-old kid.  Taylor is better, and we need him in at the point.

 

Poll
The Great Debate, Tyshawn or EJ? Fortunately we have both at our disposal, but if you had to pick just one to lead your team into the tourney who would it be?
Tyshawn Taylor
98 votes
Elijah Johnson
188 votes

286 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 150 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

haven't read yet

but congrats on the win, Penguin

by fetch9 on Mar 1, 2011 1:40 PM CST reply actions   1 recs

Thanks

for throwing that last part in there!

build a damn football program, beat some ass, and get on tv more.

by Rivethead on Mar 1, 2011 4:08 PM CST up reply actions  

Tyshawn gets more assists and more turnovers

We need the assists more than we don’t need the turnovers

by Walshdollar on Mar 1, 2011 1:42 PM CST reply actions  

In Bill We Trust

If the coach says Tyshawn is the better player, then Tyshawn is the better player. And it’s good to know that we’ll have both in the postseason – I think.

by jayhawk1996 on Mar 1, 2011 1:52 PM CST reply actions  

I love this.

Glad I came, just wish I hadn't stayed so long.

People ask me what I do in winter when there’s no baseball...Rock Chalk Talk

by Warden11 on Mar 1, 2011 1:58 PM CST reply actions  

I had a lot of fun with it

And I would welcome the opportunity to do this again in the future with KG or anyone else who disagrees with me on something I can ramble on about for hours (i.e. anything). Perhaps these could become a semi-regular feature on RCT?

by PenguinHawk on Mar 1, 2011 2:10 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

I'm definitely for it,

just have to keep coming up with topics that can be discussed.

Glad I came, just wish I hadn't stayed so long.

People ask me what I do in winter when there’s no baseball...Rock Chalk Talk

by Warden11 on Mar 1, 2011 2:33 PM CST up reply actions  

Tyshawn has been the fanbase’s choice scapegoat ever since Brady caught fire

it goes back a lot further than that…

Yea ≠ Yeah

by labbadabba on Mar 1, 2011 2:04 PM CST reply actions  

Ha.
Sure, EJ isn’t going to shoot 100% every game, but he can play the type of defense he played against The Hobbit every game.

KG, I thought you made a good point about bringing up EJ’s defense, unfortunately you also mentioned who it was against and therefor it is inadmissible. I think we have to wait until EJ’s show’s something against a much better guard before we crown his defensive achievements.

www.oreadboomkings.fantake.com

by Triston27 on Mar 1, 2011 2:18 PM CST reply actions  

he has shown something against better guards

unfortunately, if you read Audacity of Hoops (I’m in class and can’t go searching for the links) he has shown a lack of defensive ability.

by fetch9 on Mar 1, 2011 2:20 PM CST up reply actions  

Pullen

He also guarded Pullen better. Granted, when Pullen got the ball, it was going in the hoop, and there wasn’t much anybody could do about it. But EJ face-guarded Pullen really well and did the better job denying the ball.

Warden question: Is there a way without re-watching the game to determine Pullen’s points when each of them was guarding him?

by PDXJayhawk on Mar 1, 2011 2:55 PM CST up reply actions  

I don't know that I'd use Pullen

as a good example. Nobody guarded Pullen.

I just want to see him against a better guard for a length of time before I’m ready to say he’s a great defender.

www.oreadboomkings.fantake.com

by Triston27 on Mar 1, 2011 3:06 PM CST up reply actions  

curiousity

I’d be curious what Pullen’s shooting stats were when each were in the game.

by PDXJayhawk on Mar 1, 2011 3:29 PM CST up reply actions  

Tyshwan

‘Nobody guarded Pullen’
Tyshawn did in Lawrence.

by kcgregory on Mar 2, 2011 10:35 AM CST up reply actions  

Out of sight out of mind. Game was too long ago.

We can only compare the recent games in which Taylor did poorly in and EJ did well.

www.oreadboomkings.fantake.com

by Triston27 on Mar 2, 2011 2:00 PM CST up reply actions  

Something that may surprise you

Pullen only went 4-11 from two point range in that game. He just shot 5-6 from three, which ended up giving him a 68% eFG%. He also actually hit his free throws.

by PenguinHawk on Mar 1, 2011 3:34 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

Hmm, not really.

We can see how many points Pullen had when Taylor was in and how many he had when EJ was in but no guarantees of knowing who was actually guarding Pullen or what the shot was without film.

Glad I came, just wish I hadn't stayed so long.

People ask me what I do in winter when there’s no baseball...Rock Chalk Talk

by Warden11 on Mar 1, 2011 4:54 PM CST up reply actions  

I don't know who I'd favor...

but I know that it’s BY FAR my biggest concern heading into the post-season.

FYI, forced to pick one, I voted Elijah. But the vote was less for Elijah and more on account of how little Tyshawn has between his ears.

by hiphopopotamus on Mar 1, 2011 3:54 PM CST reply actions  

yes, this^

I think T2 is the better option 60% or the time but that other 40% is what scares me. The dude has a million dollar talent and a 2 cent head.

It’s really not the EJ is so much better, but I’ve reached my breaking point with the boneheaded plays.

Yea ≠ Yeah

by labbadabba on Mar 1, 2011 4:05 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

Taylor give us the better chance to win?

Not only has he not improved over three years, he’s gotten worse. The Morris twins now have a better 3 point shot than he does. His floaters don’t come anywhere near going in, his turnovers are the monkey on his back, and obviously his desire to get better is laying on her back in the player’s lounge. Johnson showed more consistency in his two games than Taylor has ever done. EJ also put up numbers T2 only does against non conference opponents. The EJ argument wins in a landslide. Point Plankin!!

by quickwit on Mar 1, 2011 3:55 PM CST reply actions  

Taylor hasn't improved at all? He has regressed since his freshman year??!?!

Do you watch our games? Do you know anything about basketball? Worst comment ever

Shit happens when you win championships

by Andrew Clark on Mar 1, 2011 4:07 PM CST up reply actions  

don't know about that...

are you going to say the same thing to KGRtC who basically stated the same thing?

Yea ≠ Yeah

by labbadabba on Mar 1, 2011 4:10 PM CST up reply actions  

Yes

He is a lot better from his freshman year. How the hell can anyone say he isn’t?

Jesus, people see him play 3-4 bad games and all of a sudden he is the worst guard on the team.

Does anyone here remember the other 2/3rds of the season? Where he scored, got guys open shots, and played pretty damn well?

Shit happens when you win championships

by Andrew Clark on Mar 1, 2011 4:15 PM CST up reply actions  

He had a nice stretch

but I don’t think it qualifies as 3/4 of the season. It’s this inconsistency that have people worried. We can win 2 ways: T2 plays well or T2 doesn’t play at all. We’ll lose if T2 plays poorly. Do you want to risk that in the NCAA?

Yea ≠ Yeah

by labbadabba on Mar 1, 2011 11:22 PM CST up reply actions  

BUT its the same risk with Elijah!

Jesus, the dudes been arguably the most inconsistent player on the team, save the last two games against horrible teams.

Do you want to risk THAT in the NCAA?

Shit happens when you win championships

by Andrew Clark on Mar 2, 2011 7:54 AM CST up reply actions  

Not really but...

I figure it’s been 3 years and T2 is still making freshman mistakes. Maybe statistically it’s tough to bear out since he’s playing a much different role than he was his Freshman year. But I know when I watch him dribble off his knee in transition, or drive too deep and gets a charge when trying to dish, or trys to force it inside when Brady or Reed are open on the wings, or takes a dumb fucking shot early in the clock that clanks off the rim effectively resulting in a turnover that he shouldn’t be our point guard.

T2 has some nice plays and he’s able to create a bit for himself and others. I’m not saying it’s ALL bad. But the good things he does, any other decent PG in the country should be able to do, without the bull shiz that I listed above.

Look, T2 is a known commodity at this point. EJ is not, and he’s been inconsistant granted but so have his minutes. I say give him a shot at starting in the Big XII tourney. See how he does. If it’s a crash and burn I guess it’s better to dance with the devil you know.

Yea ≠ Yeah

by labbadabba on Mar 2, 2011 8:58 AM CST up reply actions  

well this isn't true
But the good things he does, any other decent PG in the country should be able to do

by fetch9 on Mar 2, 2011 10:26 AM CST up reply actions  

really -

when Tyshawn is not playing poorly he’s making good decisions with the ball, not turning it over, and making solid feeds, nothing too flashy. How is that NOT what any other decent PG in the country should be able to do?

Yea ≠ Yeah

by labbadabba on Mar 2, 2011 12:09 PM CST up reply actions  

Ok smart guy

Taylor had his career high his freshman year with 26 against Oklahoma and has only played close to that against inferior teams. And to boot, here a link of his career stats clearly showing he’s declining. http://scores.nbcsports.msnbc.com/cbk/players.asp?id=82026&team=287

How does that sneaker taste in your mouth?

by quickwit on Mar 1, 2011 4:16 PM CST up reply actions  

You are looking at the stats wrong

He has been asked to play more of a point guard roll this year (was a two guard more in past seasons). He also needed to score a lot more his freshman year.

This year his assists per game are up to almost 5 (best in the Big 12). His scoring is barely down, probably because we have the Morri, Reed, Selby, etc etc etc etc etc.

This guy averages the most assists per game in the Big 12 and everyone wants to ship him out of town.

But you are right, everything in basketball revolves around how many points you score a game.

You’re digging deeper buddy

Shit happens when you win championships

by Andrew Clark on Mar 1, 2011 4:20 PM CST up reply actions  

Digging Deeper?

Those are you arguments? He leads the league in assists? Have you seen his surrounding crew? YOU could lead the league in assists with these guys. If anything you just proved my point. Taylor was given a bigger role this year thus indicating his numbers should go up. His bigger role has only shown that he clearly doesn’t work on his jump shot in the offseason, he doesn’t have it mentally, his FG% is a HUGE factor in my declining statement, and he has hurt us more than helped. And if you watched “our” games, you would see that Kansas doesn’t have a designated PG, but platoons it with the guards they have out there. It’s a motion offense designed for quick ball movement and high percentage shots. Not an offense where Tony Parker starts the pick and roll with Tim Duncan. Are you sure you graduated?

by quickwit on Mar 1, 2011 4:31 PM CST up reply actions  

So what is your problem with him then?

He doesn’t have a great jumpshot? Its not terrible, he is shooting 36% from three and his midrange game is much better.

Whats wrong with him? He turns it over? So has EJ at the point. Selby too. Etc.

Whats so horrible about Taylor?

And yeah, pretty sure I graduated. Got a pretty good job too. Thanks for asking though, and way to make a message board personel.

Shit happens when you win championships

by Andrew Clark on Mar 1, 2011 4:36 PM CST up reply actions  

You're right

His quick wit is too much for me, and my “pretended to graduate from KU on a message board self.”

I’m a lame guy, but sheesh… I’m not that lame…

Shit happens when you win championships

by Andrew Clark on Mar 1, 2011 4:43 PM CST up reply actions  

Geez!

what’s wrong with a healthy debate? I thought this boards were what they were for. Now who’s personal?

by quickwit on Mar 1, 2011 4:46 PM CST up reply actions  

Hyperbolic statements

such as yours claiming that Tyshawn is somehow worse than he was as a freshman do not constitute “healthy debate.”

by PenguinHawk on Mar 1, 2011 4:50 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

K, I must have misread this

“not only has he not improved over three years, he’s gotten worse.”

My bad.

by PenguinHawk on Mar 1, 2011 4:56 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

Sorry, I shall clarify

The level of improvement a typical KU player has over three years is astronomically higher than what Tyshawn has shown. I truly believe he helped the team more and hurt them less as a freshman. Now it seems he hurts the team more than he helps. That’s what I meant. Sorry.

by quickwit on Mar 1, 2011 4:59 PM CST up reply actions  

And if you had said that

I wouldn’t have yelled “worst comment ever”

Shit happens when you win championships

by Andrew Clark on Mar 1, 2011 5:01 PM CST up reply actions  

In a fanshot I posted last week,

I showed his offensive rating compared to the team’s offense in games. After doing that, I did the same for quite a few other players and Taylor’s numbers have the 2nd highest correlation with the offense as anyone on the team. That’s not a definitive proof but when Taylor goes, the team goes too.

Of course, with EJ playing full games that may be the case as well because it’s a team that is living on the Morri and 3 pt shooting at the moment.

Glad I came, just wish I hadn't stayed so long.

People ask me what I do in winter when there’s no baseball...Rock Chalk Talk

by Warden11 on Mar 1, 2011 5:06 PM CST up reply actions  

No, not personal at all

I just throw back what I get and I assure you I don’t lose sleep over this. I’m glad you asked me questions instead of dismissing me with “worst comment ever” this time. To answer some of your questions, here is my problem with T2.
1) work ethic – clearly he doesn’t have it and that definitely translates to how much time he devotes to watching film. He can’t guard the better guards in the country.
2) not clutch at all – T2 disappears in big games, watch the tournament last year and the year before. He’s only been clutch in maybe a handful of games in his career. Not enough for a KU junior starting PG IMO.
3) Mental mistakes – compare his mistakes to that of the previous KU guards (Vaughn, Chalmers, Collins, etc) He clearly is the weakest link compared to our past PGs.
4) Shots – he simply cannot score consistently and his floaters look horrible. I can understand a bad shooting game here and there but his bad shooting games are more prevalent than his good.

These are the things that stick out the most when watching him the past three years. Obviously, when he was handed the bigger role, he failed. Don’t believe me? Look who’s wearing street clothes at the end of the bench next game. I welcome your counter argument.

by quickwit on Mar 1, 2011 4:45 PM CST up reply actions  

Well

1) Maybe he just isn’t a great defender. Doesn’t mean he has a poor work ethic. Again, not sure where these expectations come from. Maybe he is just a good player and not going to be a great player. I mean, does every guy who plays for KU need to be an NBA caliber super awesome player? Shit, you realized we use to not only play, but START Christian Moody right?

2) This year, he has been pretty clutch in some big games (UCLA for example). Its not his role to be that clutch. He is a support player. I’d rather have the Morri or Reed taking shots at the end of games, not Taylor.

3) Here is where you are very wrong… His turnovers are not on pace to be much higher than a lot of traditional KU greats. You know who had the most turnovers in KU history? Aaron Miles. Taylor can’t break that record. Comes with playing the point.

4. His shooting percentage isn’t terrible for a point playing guard. 36% from three isn’t that bad. He has had some bad games and good ones. He doesn’t shoot that often anyways (probably what, 8 a game maybe?). Like you said earlier, he isn’t being ASKED to score. He is surrounded by scorers. So his passing skills are most important to our offense, and he leads the league in assists while providing some points when we need them… not sure what else more you want offensively.

Shit happens when you win championships

by Andrew Clark on Mar 1, 2011 4:57 PM CST up reply actions  

I see your point however..

I will try to keep it short this time:

Tyshawn DOES have a poor work ethic, make no mistake about it.
After 3 years under Self, YES!, he should be taking shots at the end. Isn’t that what he came here for? Yet he is somebody we DON’T want taking the shot. Not what I expected from someone who hung 26 against a good Oklahoma team his freshman year.
Unfortunately, KU greats are judged by how they do in the tournament and when Aaron Miles and co. lost in the first round, it didn’t suprise me that he led KU in turnovers so I don’t put Miles in the category. He made a lot of mistakes as well. You are basically celebrating mediocrity with Tyshawn. My problem with Tyshawn in a nutshell is that he turned out to be mediocre when he could have been great. Do you want someone like that leading the team?

by quickwit on Mar 1, 2011 5:08 PM CST up reply actions  

Travis Releford

has been in the program for 3 years. Should he be taking shots at the end? So has Mario Little. Same? We only have so many players, and there are only so many shots to go around. If we have better shooters, why the heck should T2 be the guy to take it?

...and the home of the Brave

by Bensa on Mar 1, 2011 5:23 PM CST up reply actions  

Mario and Travis didn't start as freshmen

Obviously Tyshawn should be in a different category when it comes to expectations.

by quickwit on Mar 1, 2011 5:25 PM CST up reply actions  

I don't think it's obvious at all.

Aaron Miles started as a freshman, and the only shot he took at the end of a game was an excuse-me 3-pointer at Mizzou to win that game. I’m not a T2 apologist necessarily, but this line of reasoning is unconvincing to me.

...and the home of the Brave

by Bensa on Mar 1, 2011 5:29 PM CST up reply actions  

whoa there

Aaron Miles is one of the best pure pg’s to ever play for KU. And he managed to lead us to two final fours before the first round loss. Why doesn’t he belong with the KU greats?

by Walshdollar on Mar 1, 2011 5:30 PM CST up reply actions  

I wouldn't say Miles "lead" us to those final fours

I think it was more Hinrich and Collison than Aaron Miles. Sure he played the point but he was definitely a role player rather than a leader. Like I said, it’s unfortunate what mark he left at the end but it’s also harshly true. When it came time for him to be the leader, he lost in the first round. And yes, it hurts to say that.

by quickwit on Mar 1, 2011 5:37 PM CST up reply actions  

yeah he was a role player

but he had the ball a lot. Point guards aren’t guys who just hang out.

by fetch9 on Mar 1, 2011 5:38 PM CST up reply actions  

If Bucknell

was Aaron Miles fault, what share of the blame do you assign Simien and Langford? They were the scorers on that team, just like the Morri are the scorers on this team. The PG doesn’t have to be a scorer. He doesn’t have to want to take the shot at the end of the game.

...and the home of the Brave

by Bensa on Mar 1, 2011 5:40 PM CST up reply actions  

Let's use Chalmers as a comparison

Our scorers on that team were primarily Arthur and Rush. But we all saw that when those two went south, Chalmers stepped in to pick up the slack. Aaron Miles, unfortunately, didn’t have the ability to pick up the scoring slack at all when it came to teams concentrating on Langford and Simien. It was a team loss against Bucknell and the leader was……Miles. Like I said, it is unfortunate we judge KU players by how they fared in the tournament. But a senior PG who steers a team to a first round loss in the tournament has a serious rain cloud, especially in this program.

by quickwit on Mar 1, 2011 5:47 PM CST up reply actions  

I'm sorry,

but this:

It was a team loss against Bucknell and the leader was……Miles. Like I said, it is unfortunate we judge KU players by how they fared in the tournament. But a senior PG who steers a team to a first round loss in the tournament has a serious rain cloud, especially in this program.

is just ridiculous.

...and the home of the Brave

by Bensa on Mar 1, 2011 5:50 PM CST up reply actions  

I'm glad you're the

arbiter of that which is the truth. Congrats on the promotion.

...and the home of the Brave

by Bensa on Mar 1, 2011 5:53 PM CST up reply actions  

Hmm...

It’s not my fault Aaron Miles lost in the first round against an inferior team. Sorry for pointing that out

I guess I didn’t realize that Aaron Miles was the only player on that team. Weird.

...and the home of the Brave

by Bensa on Mar 1, 2011 6:00 PM CST up reply actions  

For the record

I would take Aaron Miles over Tyshawn any day. But, and it’s not my fault, when you look at all the starting PGs for KU the past 20 years, where does Aaron rank? And don’t throw that assist record in there. In Bill Self’s system, the PG always has a lot of assists. That how his offense works.

by quickwit on Mar 1, 2011 6:03 PM CST up reply actions  

I'm not sure I would take Miles over T2.

Miles was recruited to run Roy’s system, which he did very well, and when he transitioned to HCBS’s system, he did okay. The fact is, HCBS’s system isn’t really a PG-central offense. That’s why he recruits combo guards over pure PG/SG players. Did the same thing at Illinois. Miles was a pure PG. T2 isn’t. Never has been. Sherron wasn’t a pure PG. Russel Robinson wasn’t a pure PG. Mario Chalmers wasn’t a pure PG. EJ isn’t a pure PG. Selby isn’t a pure PG. I can’t think of a pure PG that KU has had since Miles, whom HCBS did not recruit.

It’s really an apples to oranges-type thing to me.

...and the home of the Brave

by Bensa on Mar 1, 2011 6:06 PM CST up reply actions  

I absolutely agree with you

as you are probably surprised. I have other posts on here about how there is no real PG but rather a platoon. As for Miles, I really can’t see how you think he had an elite talent level as your “ridiculous” remarks would indicate. How is it not true that when it came his time to shine, he failed? I hate saying that but how is it not true?

by quickwit on Mar 1, 2011 6:11 PM CST up reply actions  

Losing one game in the tournament

is not enough to say he “failed.” He, along with every other player on that team, lost a game they clearly shouldn’t have lost. That doesn’t make him a “failed leader.”

...and the home of the Brave

by Bensa on Mar 1, 2011 6:12 PM CST up reply actions  

But wouldn't you agree

that how you fare in tournament play directly relates to your legacy? Yes, I know Miles was the PG for two final fours but his level of being instrumental in that was minimal compared to his surrounding teammates. My point is that Miles lacked the scoring talent that is crucial to tournament success. And because he lacked scoring talent, I don’t consider him to be a “retire his number” player for KU. Aaron Miles wasn’t THAT talented. That is all.

by quickwit on Mar 1, 2011 6:19 PM CST up reply actions  

Now you went and made me look up stats

Miles’ senior year he had a 112.y o-rating, only behind Collins’ and Vaughn’s senior years. He had a 56.3 eFg% which is better than any recent KU pg while compiling a 2.3 assist/turnover ratio and an assist percentage of around 38%.

And before you say Selfs’ system creates a lot of assists, no player was within 12% of that number and Russ Rob only had a 2.0 assist to turnover ratio. This is the year you’re complaining about leadership, by the way…

by Walshdollar on Mar 1, 2011 6:22 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

Trust Me

If you’ve followed KU for as many years as I have, you don’t care about stats, you care about banners. Well Kids, it’s been fun. Thanks for making my flight layover entertaining. If I ruffled some feathers, I apologize. As for some people on here thinking I lack intelligence, that’s a bold statement towards someone you’ve never met. Borderline stupid if you ask me. If I get another long layover Fetch, I’ll email you. Until then, this debate will be decided in the next few weeks. Remember, we’re all on the same team. Rock Chalk!

by quickwit on Mar 1, 2011 6:27 PM CST up reply actions  

OK

since you feel I don’t have the right to be heard (fascist). If you would be so nice, please tell me how I’m trolling Aaron Miles? By saying he wasn’t successful in the tournament when it came time for him to lead is trolling? How is that not true?

by quickwit on Mar 1, 2011 5:58 PM CST up reply actions  

Ok, convince me

My point is that Aaron rode some pretty good coat tails in the first two final fours but when it came his time, he failed. How am I wrong? I’m open minded. Tell me.

by quickwit on Mar 1, 2011 6:01 PM CST up reply actions  

I already said I don't feed trolls. Sorry man.

at least I hope you are some sort of troll, and not just not smart.

by fetch9 on Mar 1, 2011 6:01 PM CST up reply actions  

yes, it deserved to be typed twice

by quickwit on Mar 1, 2011 6:05 PM CST up reply actions  

as anyone who comes here regularly can tell you

I never use stats or facts to back up anything I write…oh wait that is the exact opposite.

Anyways if you want to have a conversation about it my email is easy enough to find. I just don’t like publicly embarrassing people.

by fetch9 on Mar 1, 2011 6:06 PM CST up reply actions  

dude, did you just completely ignore the above post?

The leader when we kicked the shit out of Marquette was … who? You can’t say our primary scorers lead us to those final fours one minute but Miles somehow lost us that first round game.

Sherron really shouldn’t be in your list of greats either because he “lead” us to a second round loss against Northern Iowa as a Senior leader

by Walshdollar on Mar 1, 2011 5:52 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

yes but

Sherron gets credit for his role in the 2008 championship which is why I put him in there but more so as a comparison to Taylor than Miles.

by quickwit on Mar 1, 2011 5:56 PM CST up reply actions  

Okay, I agree that he should get credit for the 2008 tournament

along with all his other accomplishments here, which is why it’s ridiculous to not give Aaron any credit for being the STARTING PG on two final four teams. Sherron was the sixth man off the bench

by Walshdollar on Mar 1, 2011 5:58 PM CST up reply actions  

So...

Sherron Collins?

Glad I came, just wish I hadn't stayed so long.

People ask me what I do in winter when there’s no baseball...Rock Chalk Talk

by Warden11 on Mar 1, 2011 6:47 PM CST up reply actions  

Just to hop in real quick,

The team has exceeded expectations of almost every national pundit/writer in the land, Taylor was the PG for the vast majority of that. I’m not going to sit here and say he’s in the same league as some great PG’s but he’s not awful either. His O-Rating has stayed in the same neighborhood while using a little bit higher % of possessions. I’d love for him to be able to drain the floaters but that ship has sailed this year I’m afraid.

As far as ceiling goes, I might lean towards Elijah.

Glad I came, just wish I hadn't stayed so long.

People ask me what I do in winter when there’s no baseball...Rock Chalk Talk

by Warden11 on Mar 1, 2011 5:01 PM CST up reply actions  

I'll lean towards EJ in terms of ceiling too

He has a better shot, is explosive and is a year younger.

Right now though, I lean towards who is more battle tested and ready, and I think that is Taylor…I think…

Shit happens when you win championships

by Andrew Clark on Mar 1, 2011 5:02 PM CST up reply actions  

Declining?

I’ll grant that he hasn’t made great statistical strides, but everything’s stayed pretty consistent. Except his assists, which keep going up. TO’s went up this year, as they would for anyone transitioning to POINT GUARD.

And as I said before, it’s not a contest to see whose numbers grow by the widest margin. It’s all about who is the better player to have running the point right now.

by PenguinHawk on Mar 1, 2011 4:23 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

There were games that Taylor completely took over.

Without him, we lose to UCLA. When we needed someone to take over and get to the rack, he did it.

Didn’t score well against Texas but nobody did. He had 6 assists against zero turnovers against the best defense in the country.

I think the recent KSU and CU games are too fresh on everyone’s mind’s. Not to mention EJ playing dominate against very inferior OkSU team.

www.oreadboomkings.fantake.com

by Triston27 on Mar 1, 2011 4:13 PM CST up reply actions  

This a thousand times

“I think the recent KSU and CU games are too fresh on everyone’s mind’s. Not to mention EJ playing dominate against very inferior OkSU team.”

EJ has played Okie Light (guarded by Alvin for christ sake) and OU.

Shit happens when you win championships

by Andrew Clark on Mar 1, 2011 4:16 PM CST up reply actions  

That's kind of how I went as well.

build a damn football program, beat some ass, and get on tv more.

by Rivethead on Mar 1, 2011 4:12 PM CST up reply actions  

Here is what I think

Taylor, when playing well, is the better option. He can get into the lane at will at times. Which leads me to my first point:

1) Taylor is better for the NCAA tournament. Why? He is an athletic mismatch, which becomes a bigger weapon in the first two rounds (when KU will likely hit less athletic teams). Taylor played lights out for most of the non-con, so much so we all did the "hey he has turned a corner" routine. Johnson has been steady, but Taylor can (and has often this year) destroy weaker teams. Just look at the non-con numbers.
2) Elijah plays better when he plays more. To me, Johnson has played his best ball of the year when Taylor was either suspended or not ready to play because he was snowed in in New Jersey. Seems he needs time to get into the game, not worry about the hook, etc. That ain’t happening on this team. But…
3) I think Elijah is the better defender, so take that for what its worth.
4) Taylor might be rusty, especially if he sits another game or two. Might it be better to stick with Johnson, especially if the team is gelling?

All these things need to be considered IMHO. I still think Taylor gives us a better chance in the end (barely). Especially in the first two, maybe even three rounds. Be nice to have both.

Shit happens when you win championships

by Andrew Clark on Mar 1, 2011 4:14 PM CST reply actions  

Agree
I still think Taylor gives us a better chance in the end (barely).

And if anything, we learned that maybe, just maybe, EJ can come in if need be and we can shorten T2’s leash a bit.

That’s not something we could have said after bad performances by Johnson against Texas and Missouri. Of course, those games are too far removed for people to use it in comparing against Taylor’s more recent bad games.

www.oreadboomkings.fantake.com

by Triston27 on Mar 1, 2011 4:23 PM CST up reply actions  

this may be nuts

but if I were HCBS I would almost just sit the two of them down and say that he was going to play them both relatively equally and have them go in and sub out at set times, regardless of quality of play, so that EJ wouldn’t be looking over his shoulder every time he screws up.

by fetch9 on Mar 1, 2011 4:29 PM CST reply actions  

Too much recent memory herr

People forget that the first 2/3rds of the year we wondered is EJ would ever play because he was playing so poorly, and also wondered if he might transfer. Taylor has two bad games in a four game span, EJ plays decent against two of the worst teams in the league, and bam! Debate.

Everyone needs to calm down about the whole Taylor thing. He showed promise his freshman year, didn’t turn into the next Isiah Thomas, and suddenly he is Eric Chenowith 2.0

The guy, for most of the year has played well. EJ has played well too, although not nearly as often, on as big a stage, or as consistently.

Thus, I think the logical move is to start Taylor and play EJ more if Taylor struggles.

Shit happens when you win championships

by Andrew Clark on Mar 1, 2011 4:32 PM CST reply actions   2 recs

^^^ this

2 or 3 weeks ago this wouldn’t have been a conversation. But now the freshest things in everyone’s minds are 1) Johnson’s great game against the prairie dog from Okie State, and 2) Tyshawn’s suspension.

The argument for EJ relies entirely on short-term memory.

by PenguinHawk on Mar 1, 2011 4:46 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

TT is probably better at this moment.

Oh yeah, except for the whole getting himself suspended thing. Saying EJ only got this shot because of that happenstance is like saying the guy who replaced you at your old job only got his shot because you came to work drunk. To be clear: EJ is not playing because he’s lucky—-he’s playing because TT massively screwed up.

Anyway… much like the Brady situation, it’s not ALL about who is the best option at any particular moment. That’s an important thing to discuss, and obviously a very important thing to the coaching staff, but there’s more to the story.

There has to be some objective considerations. PT is like an investment, and I feel like giving TT all the time on the court because he’s a little better than EJ is throwing good money after bad. At this point in the season maybe you just dance with the one who brung ya (to mix metaphors)…

But a question I would ask Bill Self, or everyone here in Bill Self’s place (if anyone read my comments): If, way back on Nov 12th, you’d known how Tyshawn’s season was going to go, would you have played EJ instead?

by sax solo on Mar 1, 2011 5:24 PM CST reply actions   1 recs

That's a tough question.

Everybody needs to remember this team has two losses. One the day after a key player received horrible news and one to a team that’s as hot as anyone in the country right now. I guess my answer would be you still have to play Taylor because of how the season has gone but with this latest suspension, I can see the other side.

Glad I came, just wish I hadn't stayed so long.

People ask me what I do in winter when there’s no baseball...Rock Chalk Talk

by Warden11 on Mar 1, 2011 5:33 PM CST up reply actions  

November and December are for player development

You don’t give someone extra minutes at tournament time because you think it’s a better investment for the future. You don’t see baseball teams calling up minor leaguers in the middle of a pennant race in September. Granted, EJ is not a “minor leaguer” but you see what I’m getting at…at this point in the season, winning right now is the priority.

by PenguinHawk on Mar 1, 2011 6:41 PM CST up reply actions  

And I'm not sure it really matters which one plays, I think it's pretty much the same

assuming the Morri play ok and Tyrady MorningReed can hit some 3’s. Neither T2 or EJ are going to win us a game unless those other things happen.

Can we all agree on that?

Glad I came, just wish I hadn't stayed so long.

People ask me what I do in winter when there’s no baseball...Rock Chalk Talk

by Warden11 on Mar 1, 2011 6:50 PM CST up reply actions  

yes

but even if you call it a wash in that respect, wouldn’t you rather the PG with 5 times the on-court experience?

/stubborn

by PenguinHawk on Mar 1, 2011 6:54 PM CST up reply actions  

I see what your getting at

because it’s all stuff I already said, so I guess we agree.

by sax solo on Mar 1, 2011 6:55 PM CST up reply actions  

Wow.

Johnson 2 to 1 over Taylor.

Glad I came, just wish I hadn't stayed so long.

People ask me what I do in winter when there’s no baseball...Rock Chalk Talk

by Warden11 on Mar 1, 2011 7:57 PM CST reply actions  

I was fighting a losing battle

the fanbase right now is, shall we say, a little upset with T2.

by PenguinHawk on Mar 1, 2011 8:12 PM CST up reply actions  

This is absolutely shocking to me.

I have rarely seen such a “what-have-you-done-for-me-lately” situation with KU Basketball. What happens if EJ goes out and plays 20 minutes tomorrow night, scores 4 points with 2 assists and 5 turnovers? Makes no sense to me.

...and the home of the Brave

by Bensa on Mar 1, 2011 11:01 PM CST up reply actions  

The point is really

I don’t think the fanbase is enamoured with Johnson, I just think they’re really sick of Taylor.

Yea ≠ Yeah

by labbadabba on Mar 1, 2011 11:30 PM CST up reply actions  

People need to get over it.

We can’t win the National Championship without T2 playing well. Period.

...and the home of the Brave

by Bensa on Mar 1, 2011 11:31 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

I also think

we have more people who can recreate Elijah’s best attributes than we do who can recreate T2’s best attributes. We’re probably going to need both to win the title, but Tyshawn is more important.

by fetch9 on Mar 2, 2011 12:35 AM CST up reply actions  

really?

We have two sure handed ball-handlers in Reed and Morningstar and a capabable back-up in EJ.

Yea ≠ Yeah

by labbadabba on Mar 2, 2011 9:04 AM CST up reply actions  

None of which

are particularly adept at breaking down defenders off the dribble. If you really want to eliminate that prong of our offense, fine. I’d rather keep it.

...and the home of the Brave

by Bensa on Mar 2, 2011 9:05 AM CST up reply actions  

Excuse me.

None of which IS particularly…still too early.

...and the home of the Brave

by Bensa on Mar 2, 2011 9:05 AM CST up reply actions  

And really,

should it actually be “none of whom is…” anyway? I hate English.

...and the home of the Brave

by Bensa on Mar 2, 2011 9:08 AM CST up reply actions  

EJ has that ability

and so does Morningstar at times, but that’s really not a vital part of our offense anyway. Besides, Tyshawn has the abililty to penetrate of the dribble but I’d be curious to know what his A:TO is in those situations. It seems to me that when T2 drives off the dribble it causes more facepalms than anything else…

Yea ≠ Yeah

by labbadabba on Mar 2, 2011 9:08 AM CST up reply actions  

EJ

may have that ability, but we’ve rarely, if ever, seen it in action. He’s clearly a freak athlete, and I’m a big fan of his. But I haven’t seen him consistently get by his man like T2 has done countless times. Yes, T2 doesn’t always finish well, and picks up a few charges too many, but the ability to break down a defense off the dribble will be crucial come tournament time, especially in a close game.

...and the home of the Brave

by Bensa on Mar 2, 2011 9:11 AM CST up reply actions  

Agreed. I think Mizzou will show us what happens when we don't attack the basket off the dribble.

Glad I came, just wish I hadn't stayed so long.

People ask me what I do in winter when there’s no baseball...Rock Chalk Talk

by Warden11 on Mar 2, 2011 9:14 AM CST up reply actions  

Personally in close games

I’d rather rely on our High/Low (which has finally re-appeared after a 3-year hiatus) and Brady’s post passing.

I think the main reason we haven’t seen EJ drive and create as much as T2 is that EJ has 70% fewer minutes than T2.

Again, and I can’t stress this enough, I am aware that EJ is not much of a better option if at all, but I’d really like to see what he can do with consistent minutes prior to the NCAA. Especaially since T2 is a known commodity.

Yea ≠ Yeah

by labbadabba on Mar 2, 2011 9:15 AM CST up reply actions  

point being -

The adage this year is, as Tyshawn goes, so does the rest of the team. Well, why not remove him from the formula entirely?

Yea ≠ Yeah

by labbadabba on Mar 2, 2011 9:03 AM CST up reply actions  

Maybe we should get rid of Selby, then.

T2 played much better the first 9 games of the year, didn’t he? Let’s just get rid of Selby.

...and the home of the Brave

by Bensa on Mar 2, 2011 9:04 AM CST up reply actions  

the problem with that analogy is that if Selby

plays poorly KU can still win. If T2 gets his minutes and lays one of his eggs, we’re screwed.

Yea ≠ Yeah

by labbadabba on Mar 2, 2011 9:06 AM CST up reply actions  

So T2 has only played 2 bad games all year?

I would argue he’s had several sub-par games, but we’ve still found a way to overcome it and win. Of course, my arguing he’s had several sub-par games doesn’t exactly help my case, but I’m not blind either.

...and the home of the Brave

by Bensa on Mar 2, 2011 9:07 AM CST up reply actions  

typically those games turned out to be squeekers

Yea ≠ Yeah

by labbadabba on Mar 2, 2011 9:10 AM CST up reply actions  

Eh, I think it's more of hope the Morri go and the white boys hit a 3

and hope the PG’s don’t kill it with turnovers on offense and fouls on defense.

Glad I came, just wish I hadn't stayed so long.

People ask me what I do in winter when there’s no baseball...Rock Chalk Talk

by Warden11 on Mar 2, 2011 9:05 AM CST up reply actions  

I am going to trust Bill Self's judgement on this.

I trusted Bill Self when he had Taylor starting. I will trust that Johnson is the better choice if he keeps the starting spot. And I will trust that Taylor is the better choice if he gets the job back. Head coaches get paid a ton of money to make difficult judgement calls like this one. And in my mind this is a dificult choice.

To me it is clear that Taylor is the better player now but not by a great margin. It is also clear that Taylor tends to do stupid things occasionally. So which way do you go? Which player, or combination of both players, gives KU the best chance to win? I’m gonna trust Bill Self to make that call because it’s his job and, thankfully, not mine.

Marty

by MartyR on Mar 1, 2011 11:23 PM CST reply actions  

What I don't get is people arguing Taylor is "inconsistent"

And EJ isn’t?

“Taylor turns the ball over too much”

EJ doesn’t?

I love me some Elijah, I’m the one who gave him the “prophet” nickname on here over a year ago, but he has somehow become a saint since everyone is pissed at Taylor and he didn’t crap himself in two games against crappy teams.

I mean, Matt Cassel stepped in for Tom Brady in a super talented offense and didn’t run the car off the road. Doesn’t mean he is Tom Brady and deserves a huge contract and a starting job (oh wait!)

Here is the bottom line: Taylor has more experience, is more battle tested, and has more of a chance of being a difference maker. Thus, when he returns I think we need him, rather than casting him off into exile like 3/4ths of this board wants us to do. Plus, we are going to REALLY need him next year… not that that matters too much… just saying.

Shit happens when you win championships

by Andrew Clark on Mar 2, 2011 8:05 AM CST reply actions  

It's a waste of effort at this point

EJ has played so few important minutes this year people just think of him as the guy who went 4-4 from three against Okie Lite. Meanwhile, fanbases have an inexplicable need to scapegoat one of their own players for all their frustrations at any given time. T2 is that guy right now, and nothing is going to change it.

That is, until he has a game with a great stat line and everyone denies that they ever had a problem with him.

by PenguinHawk on Mar 2, 2011 8:54 AM CST via mobile up reply actions  

For some of us T2 has ALWAYS been that guy.

It’s not a recent scapegoating situation. Grad, I agree, both are inconsistent. See my reply above. Basically I say give EJ a shot through the Big XII tourney as a trial by fire.

Yea ≠ Yeah

by labbadabba on Mar 2, 2011 9:00 AM CST up reply actions  

This is true.

Glad I came, just wish I hadn't stayed so long.

People ask me what I do in winter when there’s no baseball...Rock Chalk Talk

by Warden11 on Mar 2, 2011 9:04 AM CST up reply actions  

This is about where I stand (two days late to the party, I know)
Taylor has more experience, is more battle tested, and has more of a chance of being a difference maker.

I don’t love TT by any stretch, and I actually think that EJ just might be one heck of a player. But if the tournament started today, I would have to go with TT because he’s a known factor. EJ hasn’t had a chance to show us whether he should actually be starting – it’s not his fault (at least not entirely) since he hasn’t had the full opportunity – but that still means I’m taking TT as of right now. In a week or two, if EJ keeps performing better than TT has, especially against solid opponents like A&M and Mizzou, then I’ll be willing to switch my vote.

The whole problem with the world is that fools & fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts. ~ Bertrand Russell

by SagehenMacGyver47 on Mar 2, 2011 2:46 PM CST up reply actions  

Damn...this got out of hand quick...

in a good way. Definitely need to do more of these although the T2 v EJ argument is about as hot as ever right now.

Questions, Comments? email me at denverjhawk@hotmail.com

by Owen on Mar 2, 2011 9:38 AM CST reply actions  

I would say so...

This was all pretty tame when I stopped by yesterday. Glancing through them today…apparently I missed one helluva battle.

by hiphopopotamus on Mar 2, 2011 9:55 AM CST up reply actions  

next we'll do...

Is Withey the next Chenowith, yes or no? Feels a little like the old SNL skit with Mike Myers…talk amongst yourselves!

Questions, Comments? email me at denverjhawk@hotmail.com

by Owen on Mar 2, 2011 10:00 AM CST up reply actions  

Answer to that is a big no

he didn’t have the hype/predictions/etc Chenowith had… not even close IMHO

Better debates for KU fans:

Wilt Chamberlin vs. Danny Manning – Who REALLY had the better career?

Roy Williams vs. Bill Self (would anyone step up and argue for Roy? I’d do it just for fun even though I’d be throwing up in my mouth the whole time)

What really happened to the 2004-2005 team?

One and dones vs. four year guys (would you rather have a Selby or Reed? Henry or Morningstar. Etc.)

Shit happens when you win championships

by Andrew Clark on Mar 2, 2011 11:09 AM CST up reply actions  

Agreed on Chenowith, as for the other questions...

Manning

Self

Not enough buy-in from Roy-era players

4 year guys

I am more than willing to waste countless hours arguing any of these things.

by PenguinHawk on Mar 2, 2011 11:22 AM CST via mobile up reply actions  

Seeing this

reminds me of something Tully C wrote at CJ online. He was ranking the best 25 players in the Big12 and had Selby at like 23.

I sent a tweet to him asking why he still has Selby higher than Reed when he said he was actually going off for performance now. Right now, you’d have to take Reed’s Big12 season over Selby’s right?

Glad I came, just wish I hadn't stayed so long.

People ask me what I do in winter when there’s no baseball...Rock Chalk Talk

by Warden11 on Mar 2, 2011 11:28 AM CST up reply actions  

Absolutely

Shit happens when you win championships

by Andrew Clark on Mar 2, 2011 2:54 PM CST up reply actions  

How dare you try to divide AFH.

www.oreadboomkings.fantake.com

by Triston27 on Mar 2, 2011 10:01 AM CST up reply actions  

Just think that we have more potential to be great with EJ

I know what T2 can do. He’s had his chance. EJ may not be as polished, but at this point I think only more experience can help. Also, the desire seems higher to me for EJ. Obviously i can’t judge how young men think, but I see more effort and will from EJ. T2 to me does not have the point guard toughness one needs.

I hope I’m wrong.

by I need more Esteban on Mar 2, 2011 6:59 PM CST reply actions  

t2

Tyshawn taylor is an overall better point guard. He can score an dish the ball even tho he does have bone head plays but every point guard does. Obviously self knows whats up but i do think EJ should get a good amount of mins. In the long run or the tourney taylor is a better optiion

by Cmoney13 on Mar 3, 2011 5:09 PM CST reply actions  

EJ VS ???

Lobster (aka EJ), has the raw talent to surpass ANY obstacle. He needs more court time.

by Spike Troublemaker on Mar 12, 2011 10:10 AM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Rock Chalk Talk is your independent source for Jayhawk sports news, information and conversation on the web. Our goal is to provide Kansas Jayhawk fans a diverse, fair and public forum to talk Kansas sports.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Power Ranking the SEC Football Teams
Small
Dan Devine 101-30 at mizzou and don faurot 113-63 at mizzou
Small
Power Ranking the Big 12 Football Teams
Small
Best Conference Realignment Scenarios
Photo_small
RCT Beer Review: Summer Honey
Mario_small
RCT Mailbag Reminder!
Small
Kansas Basketball Recruiting Chart
Small
Marquis Jackson moves to running back
Small
KU Tourney Success Continues
Small
Boschee!!!

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Rock Chalk Talk on Facebook

Owen Kemp and Rock Chalk Talk on Twitter


Managing Editor

Rctfinalcircusstepdown_2_small Owen

Assistant Editor

Wardenhatcopy_small Warden11

Mario_small fetch9

Contributing Authors

Small hiphopopotamus

Todd_small ajanzen

David_stuff_small PenHawk

Small KU Grad 08