How Kansas Contained The Georgia Tech Triple Option

Heading into Saturday's game the question was how would Kansas contend with the Georgia Tech triple option attack. It's been well documented that the Yellow Jackets have struggled at times with big physical defensive lines. Kansas didn't really have that option at it's disposal so defensive coordinator Carl Torbush had to find way to attack it from a different angle.
The result was a gamble based on the assumption that Tech couldn't consistently pass. It wasn't perfect and Tech still put up some yards, but it was effective enough in a bend but don't break style and came up with several big stops throughout the game.

Initially the Jayhawks started the game primarily in a base 4-3 defense. After an initial drive that saw Tech move 51 yards on 6 plays for a touchdown, Kansas started to move toward the 3-3-5 formation that proved the most effective.
The above image is the first time the team came out in the set and it provides a very clear view of the personnel on the field. One of the down lineman was taken out and replaced with nickelback Tyler Patmon. As the game progressed Kansas would cheat up both Patmon and Oguntodu on occasion. The Jayhawks would also cheat the linebackers up at times or at least show a look which gave the set a little bit of a 3-4 feel at times.
As far as how they attacked the option? It was geared toward a sellout on the run, while isolating Chris Harris, Isiah Barfield and Calvin Rubles in man on man coverage depending on who was in the game.
Let's run through one play that goes through the progression start to finish.

At the snap Tech shows option. The ends and the strong side linebacker pinch while Springer reads dive to quarterback. Pat Dorsey, Richard Johnson and John Williams had a tough day. Not that they weren't effective but their role was essentially to get beat up in the middle, tie up blockers and let the linebackers work. Based on the fact that Springer, Steven Johnson and Drew Dudley finished top three for the game in tackles, I'd say they did fairly well.
The other key here is that Tyler Patmon and Keeston Terry in this instance attack immediately. Patmon takes on the lead blocker, while Terry cues on the pitchman. Lubbock Smith also played extremely well in this role and between Terry and Smith the Kansas safeties did the job. On the back side, Oguntodu rotates over.

When the fullback doesn't get the ball Dudley comes off a pinching Laptad and takes the quarterback forcing the pitch. Springer meanwhile sheds the block from his initial read, the fullback, keeps his feet and is also focused in on the quarterback. Between the two and Laptad and Johnson Jr pursuing on the backside, Nesbitt isn't going anywhere so he makes the pitch.
Meanwhile Keeston Terry is firing at the pitchman unblocked. Patmon also successfully takes on the block from the lead back, sheds it and keeps his feet to pursue to the sideline

At this point Terry who has been gunning for the pitch almost from the moment the ball was snapped is in position to make a tackle behind the line of scrimmage. If he should happen to miss, which he didn't, great execution by Tyler Patmon, Justin Springer and Drew Dudley leaves the Jayhawks with three players in pursuit and a option play that is successfully strung out harmlessly to the sideline.
It was a gamble in terms of pass defense and it didn't always work, but the Jayhawks did execute defensively more often than not. In the end Kansas used this formation and this plan of attack to help put away a top 20 team with a solid defensive effort.
13 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
love it.
great post
Beadlemaniacs - Award winning* college basketball blog (new and improved!)
College Hockey!
They dont have your heart.
Justin Springer better be big 12 def player of the week
Great synopsis
THe 3-3-5 was very effective because our safeties, especially Lubbock Smith, did a fantastic job of getting out wide and taking down the pitchman. Keeston Terry also looked very sharp, especially considering he is a true freshman and started out at WR.
The biggest thing that did Tech in was their inability to throw the ball. Apart from their long TD pass, which was simply poor coverage, Nestle Quick looked awful and we had good coverage on their WRs.
KU’s defense just provided a blueprint for how to stop the triple option: keep your LBs and safeties far off the line so they can take good angles to the pitch point, and force GTech to pass. Honestly if our defense can limit them to 25 points (with only one turnover)… well if I was a yellowjacket fan, I’d be a little worried
Shit happens when you win championships
Couple parts of the blueprint that other teams might not be able to replicate
KU secondary (from what we can tell) is very solid, and maybe even very very good. If the coverage isn’t as reliable, it’s harder to stack against the run.
GT got behind, and they weren’t able to be as patient with the triple-option as they would like.
The only people who really know where [the edge] is are the ones who have gone over it.
by SagehenMacGyver47 on Sep 12, 2010 6:10 PM CDT up reply actions
Lubbock
was a man-beast out there. So many HUGE open field tackles. Without his stops GT puts up another 14 easy.
There is no red like Chiefs red.
Once different
on that bomb you cite “poor coverage” and OO did get beat, but……….unlike past years of KU football, he was able to recover and at least was able to attempt to break up the pass.
build a damn football program, beat some ass, and get on tv more.
Agreed, in his recovery he couldn't have been any closer to the receiver without
risking pass interference. If the ball was 6 inches higher or lower, it would have been deflected or out of the receiver’s reach.
The only people who really know where [the edge] is are the ones who have gone over it.
by SagehenMacGyver47 on Sep 13, 2010 11:49 AM CDT up reply actions
Back when I coached high school defenses in the 80s, we ran a 4-4 stack; against the option, the defensive end had the QB contain. Whether he pitched or turned up, our DEs knocked him down, every time he ran the option to their side. QBs would start anticipating getting hit and get sloppy with the pitch. The corner came up to take away the pitch man, with the outside linebacker taking on the blocker, the interior linebacker reading the fullback plunge. It came down to who was the better athlete on the option pitches. I noticed in particular during the first half that KU didn’t come up and challenge the pitch man quickly enough — when the pitch was made, the rb was picking up 7-8 yards. This seemed to be when GT ran to the right (short side?). Fun to see the option again. When I took "the coaching of Football at KU(taught by Mike Gottfried), we were allowed to check out the actual 1975 KU-OU game film with Cromwell running the option against OU’s great attack. We diagrammed about half of the offensive plays on both sides of the ball, but finally just sat back and enjoyed one of the greatest wishbone games ever in college football.
great post
interesting to see the anatomy of our defense against the option…the safeties were really selling out in particular…we were lucky they didn’t run any misdirection or passes.
our defense did exactly what i thought they needed to do to win the game…bend but don’t break. i think they were a combined 3-17 on 3rd and 4th downs, which is outstanding.
BOOM YOSTED!
by Home Run Tony Cogan on Sep 12, 2010 9:33 PM CDT reply actions
If GT didn't get that one ridiculous bomb
The defensive statistics would look that much more impressive. Those corners were out on islands all night, and we never really paid for that.
by KennyGregoryRockThaCradle on Sep 12, 2010 11:41 PM CDT reply actions
I believe it was the 2nd guest blogger from GT
that characterized Nesbitt’s arm as a shotgun. Never quite sure where the pellets were going, tho some might hit the general vicinity of the target. Know the enemy.
::starts blaring Rage's Know Your Enemy::
Shit happens when you win championships
by Andrew Clark on Sep 13, 2010 7:55 AM CDT up reply actions
I think you also have to give credit to
Barfield and Rubles. They were physical with their coverages and the GT WRs struggled to get separation, which made Nesquick look worse with this throws.
Hell one of his bombs was a perfectly thrown ball…..but Barfield disrupted the route running by the WR and the ball fell harmlessly to the turf.
build a damn football program, beat some ass, and get on tv more.

by 















