Faith and Football
Living in Denver and being a Kansas fan, a new theme seems to be emerging with the football teams I keep an eye on. Tim Tebow and Turner Gill are both men with very defined views on faith. Now the topic doesn't seem to be nearly as big with Coach Gill for now as it does currently with Tim Tebow, but either way it made me wonder if this is a help or a hindrance for someone in major college or professional athletics?
Now without a doubt there are many athletes and coaches both professionally and at the amateur level that have very strong conviction and religious views. Few however choose to make it one of the defining characteristics of their public persona. Obviously Tim Tebow is a prime example of someone who has. In doing so, he has become a bit of a lightning rod for fans and media alike to either love or hate. Religion is quite obviously a very divisive topic. With athletes though, how much of that is real and how much of that is a fabrication of journalists who want to tear down someone after building him up? Do fans really care?
Closer to home we have Coach Turner Gill. Coach Gill has been forthcoming with his views and stance on religion and his faith. Unlike Tebow it doesn't seem to define him at the moment, but whether it's players, recruits or parents around the program, his faith is clearly at the forefront of his message. It's what drives his program in terms of the atmosphere he wants to create and the type of relationships he wants to foster. At the moment it appears to be very well received, but then again what recruit or player is going to say "his faith bothers me".
Turner Gill will likely attract and recruit a player that is comfortable with this as by all accounts he is open in the living rooms and on the phones as to what he's looking for and how he approaches life and his profession. Does this pose a problem potentially in the long run? Or are these exactly the type of values you want to present within a program and athletic department?
Maybe it isn't even relevant, maybe in the end the fans don't care, the media won't discuss it and the players will go into it with the expectation. The honeymoon is still in full swing, but this was briefly touched on topic of conversation on message boards and in the media when the Gill hiring was announced. Winning eliminates almost any concern, but if the program struggles or fails to meet expectations is this an area that fans and the media will target much like they have with Tim Tebow?
The topic is certainly out of the comfort zone for many and for that reason it's being left fairly well alone. But, after a couple seasons and things settle in, what if any affect will Turner Gill's strong conviction and faith have on the Kansas program if he succeeds, or to the contrary, if he fails?
Faith and football, faith and sports for that matter, there is always a connection. The question is, how much should be kept private and what are the risks and/or rewards of taking the issue off the backburner and putting it out there squarely in front of anyone and everyone examining you or your program?
70 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
This is a good topic to discuss
Shortly after his hiring, I was criticized for saying that I believe there WILL be some talented recruits who will not be comfortable with the “religious environment” (whatever that is) that Coach Gill has brought with him. Maybe I’m wrong, but I can see a Muslim player (Aqib Talib, Sadiq Muhammed two recent KU players, for example) being uncomfortable with the S&C coach keeping a copy of the Bible on his desk at all times.
Overall, I think the effect on recruiting is negligible, but I will not be surprised to learn some recruits take a pass on KU simply because they don’t like the religious environment. On the other hand, we have a higher likelihood of recruiting the next Tebow Christ…..and that wouldn’t be a bad thing.
There simply is no substitute for experience.
I agree...
I think we’ll definitely have some people that will be turned off by it and that’s fine.
I think it will be interesting to see how he approaches things on a weekly basis come fall when he is in front of the media, both local and other schools, every week for the Big 12 calls and the weekly presser.
If he chooses to be fairly outspoken on his faith I could see him becoming a bit of a divisive persona for both opposing fanbases and even our own depending on how things shake out.
If he wins, I think it’s a non issue to Kansas people…but other fans could target that area for criticism much like what has happened with Tebow.
53 Conference Championships!! and now 6 IN A ROW!!! Holy Hell...Good Luck with That!!
I don't think the issue will be how outspoken he is/isn't about his faith, but how particular he is
It’s not like the foundation of Talib’s faith and Gill’s faith are built from different principles. But if he is harping on Jesus in particular and not the faith overall, then that can get a bit uncomfortable.
by SagehenMacGyver47 on May 10, 2010 3:02 PM CDT up reply actions
If I recall
Aqib Talib was not a follower of Islam. His folks practiced for a brief time around the time of his birth but they eshewed it shortly after.
The Kansas City Royals; Successfully failing since 1986
I really don't think you can compare how Gill and Tebow express their faith, personally
from the limited time I have had listening to Coach Gill talk, it seems like he just is who he is and lives his life how he sees fit, whereas Tebow seems like he wants to remind everyone else how he lives his life.
Beadlemaniacs - Award winning* college basketball blog (new and improved!)
College Hockey!
from the limited time I have had listening to Coach Gill talk
It’s very limited in time and audience at this point. He’s the coach for Kansas football and it’s the offseason, not too many people pay attention to us right now.
Tebow has been in the eye of the media more regularly and on a broader scope. So yes it’s a huge difference in that sense, but almost every recruit and player interviewed mentions how he does bring up his faith and beliefs in the conversation.
Differences aside, could it become an issue?
53 Conference Championships!! and now 6 IN A ROW!!! Holy Hell...Good Luck with That!!
The fact
that Coach Gill is a big member of the FCA and the FCA being head-quartered in KC, MO makes it very probable that Coach Gill’s Christian faith will become more prime-time news as time passes.
There simply is no substitute for experience.
I can only speak for myself on this.
But I truly don’t care. It’s not like he can create a situation in which I have to follow his personal beliefs in order to be a fan of Jayhawk football. So whatever floats his boat.
I would like to see him stay away from certain hot-button issues, though (abortion, gay rights, etc.). Because at the end of the day, Turner is a football coach, not some moral authority. Again, don’t make me choose between my personal beliefs and my support of the Jayhawks, and you can do pretty much whatever you’d like, HCTG.
You can never have too much talent.
by KennyGregoryRockThaCradle on May 10, 2010 10:42 AM CDT reply actions
and I think right now...
that’s why the Tim Tebow thing is such a hot button out here right now. He positioned himself with Focus on the Family and has somewhat taken a stance on a “hot button issue”.
53 Conference Championships!! and now 6 IN A ROW!!! Holy Hell...Good Luck with That!!
And yet,
if you’re Charles Barkley or some other athlete making a statement about the AZ immigration law, that’s okay? I don’t think a double standard should be acceptable.
Personally, I can’t stand it when athletes or coaches or whatever make political statements. It’s just uncomfortable and sure to piss off half your fans. That said, non-political religious statements I don’t have such a problem with. People have faith, and they should be free to express it. HCTG is a football coach, but he’s also a Christian/man of faith/whatever you want to call it. He’s more than free to express that. Charles Barkley is not an economist/immigration expert or anything approaching that. He should keep his mouth shut, in my opinion. Same goes for the Suns owner. Just play the game, I say.
When is Late Night?
Los Suns....????
what a joke. I’m with ya on that Bensa. I definitely think the world and media go looking for opinions from celebrities and athletes on issues they know nothing about.
53 Conference Championships!! and now 6 IN A ROW!!! Holy Hell...Good Luck with That!!
The problem is, you're too intelligent to be listening to Charles Barkley.
Charles Barkley is not an economist/immigration expert or anything approaching that. He should keep his mouth shut
And I don’t mean that sarcastically, I’d say most of the members here fit into the same category. But for whatever reason, people love listening to him talk and so he does.
Way too many dumb people in the world today.
Glad I came, just wish I hadn't stayed so long.
People ask me what I do in winter when there’s no baseball. I’ll tell you what I do. I stare out the window and wait for spring.
by Warden11 on May 10, 2010 11:10 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Trust me, I know. ;)
The problem is, a lot of people take what a celebrity says and give a lot of weight to it when the celebrity doesn’t have a clue what they’re talking about. People assume the size of a guy’s audience is proportional to the weight of his statements. That’s more true with politics than with religion, I think.
But you’re quite right, I think, Warden.
When is Late Night?
by Bensa on May 10, 2010 11:14 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Funny you mention the celebrity angle...
I’m watching the history channel series “The Story of Us” which walks through the story of America basically. Kinda fun to watch. Anyway, they tell the history of the country with various interjections from guest commentators in between narration and the story.
It’s funny because some of the people are legitimate historians or subject matter experts. Then you get a bunch of celebrities like Micheal Douglas…Michael Strahan when discussing slavery or when they needed to talk about the Chinese building the railroads, Margeret Cho the comedian jumps in with her take on history.
Now all the comments seem fairly intelligent, but I keep wondering if these celebrities actually know what they are talking about, or if they are scripted and reading. Either way, why are they on there and not someone truly a subject matter expert in the field.
53 Conference Championships!! and now 6 IN A ROW!!! Holy Hell...Good Luck with That!!
I guess...
but I would think anyone interested in actually watching the history channel and the program would actually want to hear from people who know what they are talking about. I can’t imagine it’s really driving more viewers because they get the opportunity to see what Michael Douglas thinks about the logistical advantages of the North during the civil war.
53 Conference Championships!! and now 6 IN A ROW!!! Holy Hell...Good Luck with That!!
Not true -
History channel is brought to you by the same media company that brings you:
Jon and Kate plus 8
The Duggars
Little People, Big World
Deadliest Catch
Iceroad Truckers
There’s very little any more on the Discovery networks that has anything to do with enriching your mind. Even Nat Geo is starting to go that route. Thankfully, I also have Smithsonian TV for my non-fiction/documentary needs…
The Kansas City Royals; Successfully failing since 1986
Well of course...
these are media companies and companies don’t make money if they don’t get viewers. If they think Michael Strahan will bring in 5 more viewers than an actual expert on a subject, bingo! we get to see Michael Strahan give his opinion. Doesn’t mean it’s not valid, but it is what it is.
When is Late Night?
precisely why
I choose NOT to watch… Sadly, I’ve never gotten a call from Nielson. They only seem to call sad lonely houswives who are reality TV junkies…
The Kansas City Royals; Successfully failing since 1986
Nice...
“Chinese building the railroads, Margeret Cho the comedian jumps in with her take on history.”
So, a Korean-American modern day comedian jumps in with her take on 19th century immigrant Chinese railroad workers in America? I guess the history channel thinks all Asians are the same, huh? Off topic I know, but that kind of stuck out at me.
In a circular way though it does have something to do with the topic at hand, in that not all very religious people, like Tim Tebow and Turner Gill, are not the same either.
It's all about how he uses it
Overall I don’t see this being a determing factor at all, at least not more than say a kid or parents not wanting to play for Mangino because he was a hothead. There is a big difference between being open about your religous views and shoving said views down other people’s throats, which I don’t think is the case here. Other than saying a prayer in the locker room before a game (which most schools do anyways) I don’t see his religous views being an issue. Bottom line is that it shows that he has good values and morals and genuinely cares about the well being of his players on and off the field, which most parents and players can really respect and the ones that can’t are probably the thugs that I wouldn’t want on the team anyways.
Everybody hears, but few listen.
That's the concern:
“There is a big difference between being open about your religous views and shoving said views down other people’s throats, which I don’t think is the case here”
We just don’t know yet. What we do know is that he’s a big FCA member. And we do know that past FCA members have gotten into hot water for forcing religion upon their players (I think this was all at the High School level though).
He has to be very careful here. It’s a slippery slope. For example: “Other than saying a prayer in the locker room before a game (which most schools do anyways) I don’t see his religous views being an issue. Bottom line is that it shows that he has good values and morals” – that statement could be interpreted by Atheist to mean that they (Atheists) don’t have good morals or values because they don’t pray. And I’m betting that’s not what you intended. Slippery slope.
There simply is no substitute for experience.
It's all about first impressions
and if all I really know about someone is that they are religous my first impression is that they probably have a higher moral standard than most people, now if all I know of someone is that they are an atheist/agnostic/non-practicing I don’t think anything positive or negative about their views until I get to know them better. I’m not exactly in a position that I really care about how my statements are interpreted.
Also I have never heard any comments from his former players that his religous views ever were a major part of his coaching philosophy.
Everybody hears, but few listen.
Jesus actually spoke to this:
This more or less describes a large chunk of my Christian world-view:
5"And when you pray, do not be like the hypocrites, for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and on the street corners to be seen by men. I tell you the truth, they have received their reward in full. 6But when you pray, go into your room, close the door and pray to your Father, who is unseen. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you. 7And when you pray, do not keep on babbling like pagans, for they think they will be heard because of their many words.
Matthew 6:5-7
The Kansas City Royals; Successfully failing since 1986
by labbadabba on May 10, 2010 11:27 AM CDT up reply actions 2 recs
For me, it comes down to his position representing a public university.
As the coach of a public university, Gill shouldn’t endorse a religious position. If he wants to do so as a private citizen away from his job, I have no problem w/ it. So far I’m pretty happy w/ the way things are going. Really, it comes down to the same standards set for teachers. Should Gill start a prayer in the locker room before the game? No. Can a player do so? Absolutely. BTW, I don’t get your assertion that his religious faith shows that he has good values and morals. When I hear that sort of stuff, it’s a head-scratcher. I know plenty of religious douchebags.
by Nathan Anderson on May 10, 2010 12:32 PM CDT up reply actions
I completely agree
that he shouldn’t endorse a religion as the employee of a public university. Unfortunately he has to some extent and the issue is will it be a factor in recruiting and how he runs a team and I don’t believe it will and if anything could help in recruiting players and winning over parents.
I never said that religous people automatically have good values and morals and I’ve met a few that don’t. I’m just saying that in general I would assume most people would probably have that impression. Not to mention that in the particular case on HCTG he has proven through his words and past actions that he is a man of high moral fiber and really cares about the success of his players.
Everybody hears, but few listen.
I wonder if......
the Hail Mary will become a regular play call in the Gill offense?
:-)
There simply is no substitute for experience.
I'm not ...
… a religious person but it doesn’t bother me at all when people discuss their religion. If they try to force it on me then I have a problem.
I believe Reggie White was a very religious person.
While the Reverend may well be in Heaven...
I’m not sure his ordination carries into a jurisdiction where Jesus is actually in charge.
When is Late Night?
he also
really tried to force it on people if I’m not mistaken
Beadlemaniacs - Award winning* college basketball blog (new and improved!)
College Hockey!
I’m a religious person and I can’t stand when people try to shove their religion down others’ throats. I have absolutely no problem with any religious belief or nonbelief that anybody has, that’s their right, but who’s to say which religion is correct? This is the primary reason I can’t stand Tebow. I think it’s great that he has such strong beliefs, he’s certainly an incredible human being and a heck of a football player, but it seems like he has become “Tebow Christ” as Rivethead said above. I will say I wonder sometimes whether it’s him trying to advertise his views or if the media has taken hold of it and is forcing his hand.
by P. J. Karasek on May 10, 2010 11:52 AM CDT reply actions 1 recs
And that's where I wonder how the Gill scenario will shake out...
I think Tebow is just being himself, but the media has taken the religious angle and now that’s virtually all they talk about.
His opening presser here in Denver the first question was about the superbowl commercial with Focus on the Family and if he wanted to be in Denver so he could continue to collaborate with them in Colorado Springs. Very random question for a football player if you ask me and not really at all pertinent but it was literally the first question from the media.
Back to my point on Gill…it makes me wonder if with time the media will do a bit of the same to him.
Also PJ, welcome to the site…hopefully we’ll be seeing more of you…
53 Conference Championships!! and now 6 IN A ROW!!! Holy Hell...Good Luck with That!!
The media
“I think Tebow is just being himself, but the media has taken the religious angle and now that’s virtually all they talk about.”
I agree 100% It’s all on the media.
And why are they focusing on the religion? They want to see Tim Tebow fail. They want to see a religious kid fail.
Good news doesn’t sell. But bad news does.
There simply is no substitute for experience.
Exactly right, Rivet
Case in point: Tiger Woods. If Tebow were to foul up in his personal life, all hell would break loose, probably approaching the Tiger scale, no matter how successful (or unsuccessful) Tebow is on the field.
When is Late Night?
and for that I commend the kid..
there are more people out there who want to destroy him and see him fail and he seems to surround himself with the right people and continue to make the right choices.
It will be interesting to see how he handles it now at the NFL level where it becomes very difficult to shield players from the media. He’s a paid professional now and the scrutiny becomes much more intense.
53 Conference Championships!! and now 6 IN A ROW!!! Holy Hell...Good Luck with That!!
for him...
“the right choices”…for him.
53 Conference Championships!! and now 6 IN A ROW!!! Holy Hell...Good Luck with That!!
Yes!
It’s just wrong. Tim Tebow could save a bus-load of preschoolers from massive wreck and that news might make the back page.
But if this kid is ever caught with a hooker, I guarantee that news will be “breaking news” across every website and tv in the country.
It’s frickin wrong.
There simply is no substitute for experience.
build em up...tear em down...
and again that’s what I’m curious about with Gill. Depending on how much his views are brought to the forefront, he could be in a no win whether he fails or succeeds in terms of how the media will choose to handle the issue.
53 Conference Championships!! and now 6 IN A ROW!!! Holy Hell...Good Luck with That!!
I guarantee
that if Coach Gill is a failure as head football coach for KU, that dbags like Whitlock will allude that his faith was part of the problem.
It just makes for good story and gets hits/sells papers. Truth or not.
There simply is no substitute for experience.
It's a fair question Re: Tebow
I’m a much bigger fan of Tebow the quarterback/person than Tebow the media lightning rod, personally. I respect a man who takes his faith seriously (see “saving himself until marriage,” et. al.). I don’t see him shoving his faith down others’ throats generally, although the story of him getting shot down when offering a prayer at the NFL combine shows how difficult it is to toe the line in certain circumstances.
The Super Bowl ad controversy was really much ado about nothing, and revealed far more about Tebow’s opponents than it did about Tebow or Focus on the Family or whatever. That ad was about as vanilla and non-controversial as you could imagine and people went absolutely nuts about it.
Anyway, as to how this all relates to HCTG, I think it can absolutely be a positive. Young kids’ mothers tend to be more religious than their kids are, and a coach’s reputation as a strong man of faith can have a certain sway over a family. None of it will really matter, though, if the team isn’t producing on the field and what not, so it’s not a means to an end by any stretch. It’s a potentially helpful component, but not a defining characteristic, I’d say.
When is Late Night?
FWIW, I think the controversy about the ad
had very little to do with the ad itself…
The Kansas City Royals; Successfully failing since 1986
Yeah,
it was the fear that someone was actually going to get to say “choose life” on national TV in an ad they actually paid for. Irrational fear-mongering, it seems, doesn’t reside solely on one side of the political spectrum (not that you think it does, Labba; I know you don’t).
When is Late Night?
Well that and he was publicly allying
himself with an organization headed by Dobson, a man who has publicly defended wife beating (as a proper Christian way for a man to correct his wife).
Here’s the thing as I see it. We care about football teams more than, say, flavors of toothpaste, because we come to identify with our sports team. We say “I’m a Jay Hawk,” or “I’m a Tiger” or whatever, but we never say “I’m an Aquafresh Whitening!”. And if I’m going to pull an organization into my identity I can tolerate a lot of weird stuff – logos, chants, statistics, colorful figures what have you. But If I’m an athiest it’s hard for me to pull into my identity someone who’s main out-loud-and-in-public premise in life is that I’m a bad person for being an atheist who is likely to go hell… then that’s rough. And if I feel strongly one way or the other on abortion (and who doesn’t), then it gets very hard for me to accept something into my identity which loudly proclaims the opposite. Because whichever way you see the abortion debate, the other side tend to be seen as morally despicable (they either want to kill babies (the monsters!), or they want to force women, against their wills, to be incubators, removing freedom and autonomous control of their own body (the monsters!))…
So that’s why I don’t think anyone cares if prominent people are religious, but they do get pretty upset when someone they want to identify with (“Go us go!”) starts putting something personally noxious front and center.
by Wan Ihite on May 11, 2010 6:48 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
the story of him getting shot down when offering a prayer at the NFL combine shows how difficult it is to toe the line in certain circumstances.
Heard this story was all BS anyway and that he never offered the prayer.
well there you go.
It’s better copy to say he did and got shot down, though, isn’t it? Anyway, I don’t mean to get too deep into the media bias thing. It goes both ways at times, I suppose. It just annoys me. I’ll stop harping about it, though.
When is Late Night?
Quick joke going around Denver
Now that Tim Tebow is on the Broncos, players will have to point to him when the score a touchdown instead of up to heaven.
53 Conference Championships!! and now 6 IN A ROW!!! Holy Hell...Good Luck with That!!
which, I'm sure,
is the LAST thing Tebow would want. And this points to a larger issue regarding media bias, I think. Not that we really want to get into this on these pages, but I’ll just say this: if he was a kid who came into the NFL already having 4 kids by 4 different women, we’d never hear a peep about it. But since he’s kind of the exact opposite of that, he gets the ridiculous treatment he’s gotten (and will likely continue to get). I don’t understand it, and I’m not sure I ever will.
When is Late Night?
by Bensa on May 10, 2010 12:10 PM CDT up reply actions 2 recs
its defintitely a big question out here at the moment....
how much does the greater fanbase really care? It’s constantly shoved down our throat because he’s the Broncos QB and that’s probably one of the most influential people in Denver ever since John Elway.
So is it a fabrication of the media and being blown way out of proportion or is it a legitimate reason for such a divided fanbase in terms of drafting him? I’m enjoying the commentary myself. People either love him or hate him, but there is no in between out here right now.
and to your point, a few years ago when Travis Henry was the big offseason free agent acquisition, all were willing to “give him another chance” despite owing hundreds of thousands in child support to his 9 different kids from 9 different women. Believe he’s in prison now for cocaine distribution too.
53 Conference Championships!! and now 6 IN A ROW!!! Holy Hell...Good Luck with That!!
Couldn't agree more.
Glad I came, just wish I hadn't stayed so long.
People ask me what I do in winter when there’s no baseball. I’ll tell you what I do. I stare out the window and wait for spring.
We've all rooted for certain players that have shady pasts in recent years.
Yet, Tebow is the one who gets hated on the most. Anybody else think that’s somewhat backwards? I’m trying to avoid a “get off my lawn” rant while I’m at it.
Glad I came, just wish I hadn't stayed so long.
People ask me what I do in winter when there’s no baseball. I’ll tell you what I do. I stare out the window and wait for spring.
The closest thing to Tebow
that I can think of is Tyler Hansbrough. White athlete, superior college player at hugely successful school, questionable ability to translate that success to the professional game, taken higher than people assumed he would be, etc. Of course, Hansbrough didn’t have the religious angle, but I’m not convinced Tebow would be treated much differently without it.
Anyway, it’s an interesting discussion, and I don’t understand the hate out there for these guys (other than Hansbrough choosing UNC over KU, of course). Oh well…
When is Late Night?
Thinking about it, I guess a lot of it is driven by ESPN.
They aren’t going to talk about the guys who have multiple kids while in college because nobody wants that kind of stuff mixing with their sports.
Glad I came, just wish I hadn't stayed so long.
People ask me what I do in winter when there’s no baseball. I’ll tell you what I do. I stare out the window and wait for spring.
Ah, ESPN
Can’t live with it, can’t live without it.
I think you’re right, though. The same thing happens with non-sport news, too, of course. It’s all a part of the 24-hour news cycle and the blogosphere parsing every which thing six ways from Sunday.
I’m not saying there’s nothing good that comes from it; obviously that’s not the case. But there’s a lot of bad that comes with the good.
When is Late Night?
I think the relgious/moral thing will help the program
Recruiting wise, lets keep it real. Most football players, especially those from the regions we heavily recruit from, are from strong Christian up-bringings. One thing Gill has done well is present himself to be relateable. Kids are saying “I can relate to him” or “He has a strong faith like I do, etc” Should help, IMHO.
I think this also helps in terms of erasing the past. After Manginogate the program was infected with a "treats players poorly" or "abusive" type Stigma. Bringing in a guy who preaches religious morality and keeping a strong faith is a good way to combat that image.
I guess I’m really just looking at it from a PR/Recruitment standpoint but thats what I care about. I don’t care if our coach is religous, not religious, Christian, Jewish, Muslin, Hindu, Buddhist, etc etc etc. I want to win football games. I don’t think he has crossed any lines so far in terms of the public school/religion boundaries, no more so than a lot of athletes and coaches (Tebow like you mentioned above). As long as that Status Quo remains, then no quarrel will be heard from me.
Shit happens when you win championships
The topic at hand...
I’m close to the line of thinking KU Grad 08 just stated. I definitely think it will be a strong pull for quite a few parents of recruits. There will also be recruits who will shy away from it, but I think more will be attracted by it than repelled by it overall.
As I kind of alluded to, not all very religious people are the same. I haven’t paid a ton of attention to Tebow, but he does seem to wear his religion and morals on his sleeve so to speak. He tends to bring up Jesus and his religious beliefs even when not questioned about it and when it’s not really pertinent to the question asked. It kind of reminds me in a way of the people who go to church EVERY Sunday and to every church function, and make sure that everyone knows about it. They also keep count of who isn’t going to church every Sunday and they also make sure everyone knows about that too. All the while, other than devoutly going to church and doing all the “right” things in public, they aren’t doing much else to live up to the basic morals of their religion by non-stop judgment of others while positioning themselves as being morally and religiously superior to those whom they judge. It’s when someone like this gets exposed in an immoral act or behavior, or doing something directly opposed to what they’ve been publicly espousing, that the media and a lot of people in general leap all over them. Tebow rightly or wrongly has the image of someone like this with much of the media and many people/fans, where people are just waiting for him to be exposed as the ultimate hypocrite.
As far as I can tell, Turner Gill is very religious, but he doesn’t necessarily wear it on his sleeve. Maybe he does in private with recruits, but when I’ve seen him in interviews or press meetings, he doesn’t. When asked about the QB situation, he doesn’t start going off on a tangent about God or Jesus or his religious beliefs, like some other very religious people tend to do. He talks about the QB’s. I know it’s difficult for some people to understand, but when people do that kind of thing and you don’t happen to share the same beliefs it often times comes off as arrogant, annoying and insulting and even disturbing on some level not mention somewhat alienating. When asked about his philosophy and motivations, he does talk about his strong religious beliefs and ideas, which is directly pertinent to the question. So, I don’t see Turner Gill in the same light as Tebow has been (rightly or wrongly) portrayed right now.
Adding to some of the comments about the FCA, I know of a couple of Kansas high schools where the head coach was an active member of FCA and strongly encouraged members of their football teams to be members as well. It also seemed that those coaches were holding it against players who weren’t FCA members and making playing decisions in part on that. I heard the same thing echoed by a few players and parents too. I don’t know if it’s fact or these were just players and parents complaining about not getting playing time or whatever, but I heard it from enough people to think there’s credence to what they said and from the outside it sure looked like that was going on. I haven’t really heard or seen anything above the high school level and the FCA though.
It's not just the very religious families.
The reality of at least theistic religions (Judiasm, Christianity, Islam) are that they teach what is genreally referred to as good morals. These are traits that most parents want in their children, regardless of whether they hold any particular belief about the diety of Jesus. It is the reason that parents will send their children to Sunday School, or vacation Bible school, regardless of whether they go or not. It is the reason that many will start attending church when they have kids.
Parents will want to send their sons to play for Coach Gill, because he is a man of integrity, and they all hope that their sons learn integrity from him. And even if they don’t learn integrity, the parents will believe that their sons will be less likely to have something bad happen to them. They believe they can trust Coach Gill and co with their sons’ well being. It is the nature of a parent. We want what is good for our children. Strike that – we want even more better for our children than we can give ourselves.
In Turner’s case, his integrity grows out of his relationship with God thru Jesus Christ, and that will be that much more of a bonus for some parents. The real issue tho is that Turner Gill is a man of integrity and parents want that for their children.
You just hit . . .
. . . the nail on the head, Dagger. Personal integrity is the issue, not religion. As others have noted, religion does not necessarily produce integrity; but strong personal convictions can, including convictions based on faith.
I hope you don’t mind input from a Mizzou fan, but a good correlation is our basketball coach Mike Anderson. He is a man of strong personal faith, who has set an example as to how he expects his players to act. He does not demand they go to his church, or any church: but he does require them to conduct themselves in a responsible manner, according to their position as student/athlete leaders.
He does not yell “Praise the Lord” after every basket made; nor blame every foul or wrong call by an official on the Devil. Nevertheless, his players and Mizzou fans understand that he believes his successful coaching career is the result of his faithfulness to God.
This has, indeed, affected his recruiting — making it ever stronger. He is a man who does not change how he deals with a young man according to the player’s level of talent or social standing. Everyone is dealt with in the same thoughtful, caring manner: Anderson truly treats his players, and others, the way he expects to be treated.
Turner Gill is a very similar type of coach. You guys are fortunate to get such a man at KU; he is going to turn your program back around and put some stability under it. I look forward to many more years of exciting Border War games between two teams filled with quality student/athletes: that is what collegiate athletics are all about.
Thanks for chiming in...
very good points, feel free to come around any time. We definitely welcome a Mizzou fan with a good perspective anytime.
53 Conference Championships!! and now 6 IN A ROW!!! Holy Hell...Good Luck with That!!
He does not yell "Praise the Lord" after every basket made...
Now that would be kind of funny you have to admit. Can you imagine if he did that for free throws too. You’re watching a bball game on TV and a guy is shooting free throws, all is quite, he makes it! and all of a sudden in the background you can hear someone yelling “Praise the Lord!!”. I know that would probably make me laugh a little.
I agree with dagger and countrycal, that integrity is universal regardless of what your religious or philosophical beliefs are. People of all kinds can respect and admire integrity.

by 


















