Statistical Rearview:Kansas v UCLA
It wasn't as clean or crisp as you'd like to see, but it was UCLA in Pauley Pavillion. Kansas led from the opening tip and never relinquished that lead to a clearly rebuilding UCLA squad. From a gameflow perspective Kansas truly began to pull away in this one near the 17 minute mark of the second half after UCLA pulled as close as it would for the duration at a six point deficit. I can't recall for certain but it seems this may have coincided with the eye poke from hell.
Of the four factors to winning the Jayhawks won three of them. eFG%, TO% and offReb%. Most surprising was that the Jayhawks pulled out the advantage in offensive rebounding percentage but that might have more to do with the disparity in FG% than it did with the actual offensive boards. Kansas was more efficient as a whole on Sunday and combined with the talent gap it made for a pretty comfortable win.
From a statistical standpoint this game was pretty even minus one column and that's the FG department. Kansas was plain and simple better at finishing. A lot of that has to do with Markieff Morris' effectiveness underneath as well as Xavier Henry's efficiency from the field. Minus that area though this one was surprisingly pretty even. A slight rebounding edge to Kansas in the game but turnovers, FG attempts, steals and nearly everything else this thing was played fairly even. Prime example of getting by on talent alone in this one.
| Stat | Game | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Points | 73 | 61 | ||||
| FG Att | 63 | 61 | ||||
| FG Made | 28 | 22 | ||||
| FG Pct | 44.4 | 36.1 | ||||
| FT Att | 17 | 19 | ||||
| FT Made | 12 | 11 | ||||
| FT Pct | 70.6 | 57.9 | ||||
| 3pt FG Att | 17 | 17 | ||||
| 3pt FG Made | 5 | 6 | ||||
| 3pt FG Pct | 29.4 | 35.3 | ||||
| Rebounds | 43 | 36 | ||||
| Off Rebs | 16 | 16 | ||||
| Def Rebs | 27 | 20 | ||||
| Team Rebs | 6 | 3 | ||||
| Assists | 12 | 11 | ||||
| Steals | 8 | 8 | ||||
| Blocks | 5 | 5 | ||||
| Turnovers | 14 | 15 | ||||
| Fouls | 18 | 12 | ||||
Markieff Morris comes up big in the player impact chart which is great to see. The overall improvement in the Morri from last season to this season has been HUGE. The maturity level of their game, the lack of silly fouls and turnovers and finishing around the rim has been night and day comparitively. If these two continue to develop at this pace, they could become damn fine Jayhawks before it's all said and done.
From an individual statistic standpoint I'm looking at the minutes and really hoping we can find a way to keep Sherron from having to go 37 minutes in a contest. In some ways Sherron's game yesterday resembled a bit of last season. Pushing things instead of letting the game come to him. A big part of that might have to do with the lack of a 2nd point guard or someone who can carry the torch as Tyshawn Taylor is also channeling his struggles from a year ago.
Cole is doing the job on the interior in terms of rebounding and causing havoc defensively, but he hasn't quite found his niche offensively with the new/improved talent on this team.
Fortunately the Morri went for 23 pts, 15 rebounds and only 3 turnovers. Another bright spot continues to be Xavier Henry who easily contributed 16 and got in the mix with 5 rebounds. His 4 turnovers were tops on the team but if I recall correctly 2 were very early on when he may have been a little juiced up playing at UCLA.
All in all, it's a win. Still this team has a ways to go in order to find it's identity. They are winning every game right now based on talent. The good news is Bill Self is still sitting on that bench and he finds a way to gel teams better than nearly anyone.
| S | MIN | PTS | FGM | FGA | FG% | FTM | FTA | FT% | 3PM | 3PA | 3P% | OR | DR | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | PF | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S. Collins | * | 37 | 14 | 6 | 15 | 40 | 2 | 4 | 50 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | |
| C. Aldrich | * | 32 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 16 | 5 | 6 | 83 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3 | |
| X. Henry | * | 32 | 16 | 5 | 9 | 55 | 2 | 2 | 100 | 4 | 7 | 57 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | |
| M. Morris | * | 26 | 4 | 2 | 7 | 28 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | |
| T. Taylor | * | 25 | 8 | 4 | 9 | 44 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | |
| T. Reed | 22 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 33 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| M. Morris | 21 | 19 | 8 | 11 | 72 | 3 | 5 | 60 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | ||
| E. Johnson | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | ||
| T. Robinson | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||
| S | MIN | PTS | FGM | FGA | FG% | FTM | FTA | FT% | 3PM | 3PA | 3P% | OR | DR | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | PF | ||
| M. Roll | * | 34 | 16 | 6 | 13 | 46 | 2 | 2 | 100 | 2 | 6 | 33 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
| M. Lee | * | 34 | 12 | 4 | 10 | 40 | 3 | 4 | 75 | 1 | 3 | 33 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | |
| N. Dragovic | * | 32 | 14 | 5 | 13 | 38 | 1 | 2 | 50 | 3 | 8 | 37 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | |
| R. Nelson | * | 23 | 9 | 4 | 10 | 40 | 1 | 2 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| J. Keefe | * | 10 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| J. Andersen | 30 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | ||
| T. Honeycutt | 19 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 16 | 1 | 2 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | ||
| J. Morgan | 15 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 66 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | ||
| B. Lane | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
0 recs |
22 comments
|
Comments
watched the game on DVR last night
Eye-poke from hell. That was brutal.
Also, how many times did Cole have a Bruin go over the back? The refs kept their whistles in their pockets quite a bit last night.
Me no likey Clint Bowen.
something I noticed
Was that anytime one of our guys was in the air, whether it was for a shot or a rebound, a UCLA player undercut them. When they tried to pick up charges, they would slide underneath already leaning back, so that it looked like as our player jumped to shoot, he was already knocking over their defender, even when the defender’s position was unsustainable and would lead to them falling backward regardless of whether the offensive player jumped or not.
by DCJayhawk0208 on Dec 7, 2009 10:02 AM CST up reply actions
All I know is...
Kieffer was a baller last night.
I don't know, I like to think that things started out initially with good intentions, but then we just loused it up. Kind of like intelligence. We have this glorious thing that allowed us to survive for millenia and now we use it to write porn film plots involving pterodactyls. Talk about wasting the gift.
Reminded me a little of the memphis game
In which our advantages with Cole and the Morri were evident the whole game and lead to a win. Last night it was Cole on D (his struggles on O continue to be a concern) and the Morri pimp-handing teams down low.
A concern is that we aren’t getting good offense from our half court set. Our transition offense off quick rebounds and turnovers with Sherron, X and Tyshawn is unstoppable, but we gotta get some better offense in the half-court set. Last night’s was pretty abysmal.
agree completely...
the half court offense is struggling to find an identity at the moment. I really believe they need to run the offense through the interior. Feed the ball to Cole, get him comfortable and let him work. I truly believe his struggles offensively right now are due to a lack of fitting in or finding his niche in this new group. Overall though his post moves are improved, he gets to the line and he’s drawing more and more double teams. Those double teams can play right into our hands because Cole seems better equipped this season to pass out of them.
By better equiped, I mean that we have more scoring options(Sherron, Xavier, Morri). That’s three positions on the court he can look to when double teamed whereas last year he pretty much had one(Sherron).
Work the high/low, run the offense through Cole and I think we can have a half court offense that is extremely efficient.
Some people are like Slinkies...not really good for anything but they make you smile when pushed down the stairs.
I agree a lot should run through Cole
At the same time though he needs to make quicker decisions when he gets it. Either move quick to score or as soon as the double comes throw it back quick so a guard has an open shot/lane to drive.
I’d also like to see some pick and roll with the big guys more. This seemed to work very well in the past with the athletic big men we had and resulted in layups for our guards or cuts/allyoops for our big men to finish.
Also a few simple screens to free our shooters could help too. X and Sherron have been really on this season shooting from the outside, if the offense is struggling why not set them up with a basic screen for a three?
All in all anything better than last night, but in typical Bill Self fashion, our defense and ability to score in transition means we have a shot to beat anyone. If the half court game develops though we will be scary.
Cole...
At the same time though he needs to make quicker decisions when he gets it. Either move quick to score or as soon as the double comes throw it back quick so a guard has an open shot/lane to drive.
Could not agree more. I think Denver’s point about him passing better our of double-teams is true as well (in fact, our bigs in general have been passing well), but he needs to recognize what he has MUCH sooner.
His ability to shoot didn’t just disappear, but he looks like he reacts to the defense too late and it leads to him forcing a bad shot. Just hasn’t looked comfortable in quite a while. Very odd.
WARNING: THREAD HIJACK
Hiphop, got any news on the FB coaching search? I saw an Arkansas radio host “confirmed” Nutt to KU. Cracked me up.
by DCJayhawk0208 on Dec 7, 2009 12:31 PM CST up reply actions
Does that make Ole Miss Tier 3, or us Tier 2?
RODD TEESING, my arch-nemesis! Give us back our TODD, you rapscallion!
by KennyGregoryRockThaCradle on Dec 7, 2009 12:45 PM CST up reply actions
Ole Miss, Tier 2.99; KU, Tier 2.9899999999999
thoroughly depressing if true.
by DCJayhawk0208 on Dec 7, 2009 1:13 PM CST up reply actions
Anyone confirming a hire...
either knows A LOT more than me…or is trying to run a little too far with something that can’t take them there. I’d lean toward the latter, but who knows. Just remember that Jimmy Sexton is Nutt’s agent and it almost always benefits a client to have their name be in the “wanted” category. I do believe he’s a candidate though, but I’m all but positive he’s not the top choice.
As far as news on my end, I was told early this morning that Harbaugh will be interviewing today. Take it for what it’s worth.
by hiphopopotamus on Dec 7, 2009 1:56 PM CST up reply actions
Seriously though...
What the hell happened to UCLA? When they made 3 straight final fours, I thought they had really struck a goldmine- Howland’s defensive tenacity and in-game strategies combined with a rich local recruiting base.
I figured they would consistently be getting guys in the “Aaron Afflalo/ Josh Shipp” mold, and great point guards (Collison, Holiday, etc.). Now they’re depending on a bunch of pluggers with minimal athleticism.
Did they lose like a key assistant that was their head recruiter or something? I don’t get it.
RODD TEESING, my arch-nemesis! Give us back our TODD, you rapscallion!
by KennyGregoryRockThaCradle on Dec 7, 2009 1:06 PM CST reply actions
Similar to what happened to Florida
Lost key guys and afterwards seemed to be left with a ton of role players, which is fine when you have 2-3 stud guys to pair em with.
Guess they haven’t fully recovered from the train running Memphis put on em in the final 4 two seasons back.
I think Howland
is enough of a hardass that the best recruits don’t want to go there, or if they do, get the hell out as soon as possible. Self can be extremely rough on kids in practice, but once it’s over can pick them back up with his personality. I don’t think Howland has that ability to pick kids up, so it seems more like a grind for the kids there, and they take off for the pros whether they’re ready(Love) or not.(Holliday)
by hunter s. royal on Dec 7, 2009 1:54 PM CST up reply actions
Yeah
He seems like the type that is perfect to turn teams around and build less known teams, and that was perfect for when he inherited UCLA from Steve “the Duck” Lavin. Now though it will be interesting to see if they can sustain the success they had in the past few years longterm, like you said it may be hard to get kids with that style.
In southern LA though, I mean COME ON MAN. You’d think location, history and the recruiting hotbed UCLA, USC, etc would always be tourny legit teams
I'd agree,
even with guys going pro early, they should always be better than this year. Though they’ve had a lot of injuries, maybe they’ll get it figured out and be a solid team by year’s end.
by hunter s. royal on Dec 7, 2009 4:23 PM CST up reply actions
To be fair
They did flat-out beat us for Bobo, didn’t they? Maybe he’s a flop, but we definitely made a strong push for him once LSU fired their old coach, and couldn’t win out over the Bruins.
RODD TEESING, my arch-nemesis! Give us back our TODD, you rapscallion!
by KennyGregoryRockThaCradle on Dec 8, 2009 1:25 AM CST up reply actions
One more thing BTW
You’ve got a typo in the first sentence there, Denver- I’m assuming you meant to say, “It wasN’T as crisp…”
RODD TEESING, my arch-nemesis! Give us back our TODD, you rapscallion!
by KennyGregoryRockThaCradle on Dec 7, 2009 1:08 PM CST reply actions

by 














