Kansas vs. Memphis Statistical Rearview
It's back for another season! A statistical look into the rear view mirror at last nights Kansas Jayhawks basketball game. Was it pretty? Nope it sure wasn't, but I never truly felt like Memphis was going to beat the Jayhawks except perhaps when that final three was hurled into the air. It wasn't the Kansas we'd seen through three games, but basketball is a game where off nights happen. Win it with defense and rebounding. On to the stats
First up the game flow chart. Pretty straight forward really. What's the score? How does it correspond to the clock? and most interestingly, how safe is the lead? Felt safe last night to me, but that might be my overwhelming confidence in this team right now because obviously it really wasn't ever safe. Blind optimism is what I like to call it.
Four factors to winning. Here's a quick breakdown:
eFG% - effective field goal percentage (eFG%). eFG% is like field goal percentage except that it gives 50% more credit for made three-pointers (since it accounts for more points).
TO% = Turnovers / Possessions.
OR% = indicates a team's ability to get second chance shots, which dramatically improves efficiency. Offensive Rebounds / (Offensive Rebounds + Opponent Defensive Rebounds).
FT Rate = This isn't just a measure of how many free throws a team makes, but the frequency in which they go to the line. Free Throws Attempted / Field Goals Attempted.
Those things in mind Kansas did a solid job in every department but turnovers. Par for the course last year as I recall. Hopefully we can get that under control soon. Still no real secret how Kansas won this one. Rebounding and defense.
| Game | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Points | 55 | 57 | ||||
| FG Att | 55 | 43 | ||||
| FG Made | 19 | 20 | ||||
| FG Pct | 34.5 | 46.5 | ||||
| FT Att | 16 | 21 | ||||
| FT Made | 11 | 16 | ||||
| FT Pct | 68.8 | 76.2 | ||||
| 3pt FG Att | 25 | 5 | ||||
| 3pt FG Made | 6 | 1 | ||||
| 3pt FG Pct | 24.0 | 20.0 | ||||
| Rebounds | 25 | 36 | ||||
| Off Rebs | 9 | 8 | ||||
| Def Rebs | 16 | 28 | ||||
| Team Rebs | 3 | 2 | ||||
| Assists | 4 | 10 | ||||
| Steals | 9 | 8 | ||||
| Blocks | 3 | 6 | ||||
| Turnovers | 13 | 21 | ||||
| Fouls | 20 | 14 | ||||
Statistically the team obviously didn't produce offensively the way we've come to expect. 21 turnovers is a concern and hopefully shooting at a better than 46% clip will be the norm. Rebounding and defense was the key though. Memphis held to under 35% from the field partially due to their tendency to chuck threes, but I'd like to think our defense had something to do with that. 6 blocks, 8 steals and a dominating performance by Cole in the middle. He was changing shots and making blocks all night long. Hence all the 3 point attempts maybe?
Player impact chart shows a whole lot of Cole last night. This is a team with so many weapons and they've really lacked the focus on the inside game in the first three contests. It's nice to see them go down low to the reliable big man when things were tough. Also nice to see X. Henry getting involved in the rebounding.
| S | MIN | PTS | FGM | FGA | FG% | FTM | FTA | FT% | 3PM | 3PA | 3P% | OR | DR | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | PF | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E. Williams | * | 39 | 21 | 6 | 18 | 33 | 6 | 8 | 75 | 3 | 11 | 27 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | |
| W. Kemp | * | 35 | 7 | 2 | 9 | 22 | 2 | 2 | 100 | 1 | 3 | 33 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| R. Sallie | * | 33 | 5 | 2 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 1 | 100 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 4 | |
| D. Mack | * | 24 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 66 | 1 | 3 | 33 | 2 | 3 | 66 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | |
| P. Henderson-Ni | * | 19 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 33 | 1 | 2 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | |
| W. Witherspoon | 26 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 33 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | ||
| W. Coleman | 24 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 66 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||
| S | MIN | PTS | FGM | FGA | FG% | FTM | FTA | FT% | 3PM | 3PA | 3P% | OR | DR | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | PF | ||
| T. Taylor | * | 33 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 1 | |
| S. Collins | * | 32 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 71 | 1 | 2 | 50 | 1 | 1 | 100 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| X. Henry | * | 32 | 11 | 3 | 11 | 27 | 5 | 6 | 83 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 2 | |
| C. Aldrich | * | 30 | 18 | 7 | 10 | 70 | 4 | 5 | 80 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 2 | |
| M. Morris | * | 15 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 100 | 2 | 2 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | |
| M. Morris | 31 | 10 | 4 | 7 | 57 | 2 | 4 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | ||
| T. Reed | 18 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||
| E. Johnson | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | ||
| T. Robinson | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
0 recs |
17 comments
|
Comments
Hmm
Anyone else think the Kansas football team beat their offensive prowess into the basketball team?
Anyone?
I thought you knew that algebra was all razzamatazz. A Globetrotter always saves the good algebra for the final minutes.
by SlamDunkTheFunk on Nov 18, 2009 1:23 PM CST reply actions
don't say such things...
good news is we know we’ll have a defense with Bill Self and the bball team.
Some people are like Slinkies...not really good for anything but they make you smile when pushed down the stairs.
Not to mention
an athletic and skill advantage over virtually every team out there. So we’ve got that going for us…which is nice.
Operation 40-0 is a go. Proceed to target.
Jimmy's Joes...and X's and O's...
not a bad recipe for success
Some people are like Slinkies...not really good for anything but they make you smile when pushed down the stairs.
Turnovers killed us last night
Cut those down and make some bunnies down low and we win that game by 14. Oh well. Just get those things fixed and keep feeding Cole. Big mans hungry
When Sherron is down, like he was
Tyshawn needs to step up, he didn’t. 2 points in 33 minutes, not to mention 0 for 4 from the field and 7 turnovers.
"That pitch wasn’t down and in, that pitch was down and up." Tim McCarver
by wrigleyrocker12 on Nov 18, 2009 5:46 PM CST reply actions
Really gotta get more from the 2 spot
Either TT, Elijah, or CJ need to step up. This team can’t get to where it wants to with Reed playing the bulk of the minutes. Maybe you slide X into the 2, and start Marcus at the 3?
RODD TEESING, my arch-nemesis! Give us back our TODD, you rapscallion!
by KennyGregoryRockThaCradle on Nov 18, 2009 7:08 PM CST up reply actions
We'll see something different if T2 doesn't produce.
Last night was far from pretty, but I’m not worried about anything yet.
I used to work with an old man that told me. Son, every workplace has a dumbass, if you don't have one where you work, then I'm afraid you're it.
T2's problem is trying to do too much
He is out of control, trying to fly at a 100 mph and attack. He needs to relax and play in the context of the offense. He got great experience with the U19 team this offseason, hopefully he gets into practice, stays within the offense, and continues to play solid D. Thats all we need from him. Same can be said about X. Calm down, don’t try to force it, play within the offense. Your points and productivity will come.
This might sound like a dumb question
But CJ can play after the first half of the season right? I heard he has been looking great.
"That pitch wasn’t down and in, that pitch was down and up." Tim McCarver
by wrigleyrocker12 on Nov 18, 2009 9:41 PM CST up reply actions
pretty sure he can play right now...
just an injury keeping him out…maybe I’m wrong
Some people are like Slinkies...not really good for anything but they make you smile when pushed down the stairs.
Not wrong
CJ is available immediately. He did not have to sit out at all. Only injuries have kept him off the floor. He’s finally been cleared medically, but obviously isn’t quite up to full speed on everything HCBS is going to demand of him just yet.
Operation 40-0 is a go. Proceed to target.
Cool, thanks.
"That pitch wasn’t down and in, that pitch was down and up." Tim McCarver
by wrigleyrocker12 on Nov 19, 2009 7:23 AM CST up reply actions
No, actually
It sounds like a dumb question because CJ hasn’t been practicing til the last couple days, so the only way he looks great is if you like his feaux-hawk.
Do you mean fro-hawk?
"I'll Be Deep In The Cold, Cold Ground Before I Recognize Missourah!" Abraham Simpson
CJ played tonight guys
Although I’m sure your probably caught it. Looked pretty good, hit a three and a nice layup off a good feed. Not too shabby for someone who has been battling an injury.

by 














