An Article Calling for the Firing of Mark Mangino
http://www.coachesaid.com/Blog/fred-davis/2009/11/1/Is-it-time-for-Mangino-to-Go
An interesting piece by someone named Fred Davis calling for the end of the Mangino era. His main points seem to be that while KU should applaud the job that Mangino did to bring the program to respectability, he has taken the program as far as it can go. He points out that with all the money Lew Perkins is pumping into the football program, coaching salaries, facilities, stadium upgrades, etc that ol Lew isn't going to be content with a team that wins 6-8 games a year and every now and then surprises someone.
While I don't necessarily agree with firing Mangino, the piece is still a very interesting read. Personally I am in favor of giving Mangino another year with some of the talent from recent recruiting classes maturing and the easier Big12 slate. If we have a season next year like this (or worse) then its time to start exploring other options. It is interesting to note some of the replacement possibilities Davis mentions, Tommy Tuberville was the most interesting to me.
I will agree (and most of my fellow KU sport junkie friends I have share a similar opinion) that our coaching this year has not been good. Players are regressing, we do not adjust at all during games, our time management at the end of halves is terrible (then again it always has under Mangino), and to make it all worse, our fundamentals are just gone. Timely fumbles, personal fouls, you name it. Really before the Orange Bowl season I was always very critical of the coaching job. That magical season was amazing, but after last year and now this debacle, it is starting to feel more and more of a fluke.
So what is YOUR opinion, valued Rock Chalk Talk reader. Will/should Mangino fall victim to the standards he helped build and the expectations that were created after the Orange Bowl win? Is this season just a bad year or do the mounting loses coupled with last season's struggles point towards the program heading in the wrong direction? Speak. Er, write.
70 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I say no
I love Mangino, and there may be something to the fact that a given coach can only take a program so far…Mangino kinda reminds me of Ralph Freidgen at Maryland (in more ways than one)…he was only able to do it for a short while and couldn’t sustain it…
However, Mangino HAS taken us to bowls with three different QB, so it’s not like all of our success is Reesing-driven…quite the contrary, without our dominating D from 07, we have been a marginal bowl team the last two seasons.
When it’s all said and done, I won’t be surprised if Mangino gets the ax, but not this year, no way. However, if we have the same result next year, I could see him being on a very, very hot seat.
This season has been a huge disappointment but there are a number of really talented players in the pipeline, and I am optimistic that we’ll be bowling again in 2010.
"He once had an awkward moment, just to see how it felt...he lives vicariously...through himself- He is the most interesting man in the world"
by Home Run Tony Cogan on Nov 15, 2009 9:33 PM CST reply actions
If We Did This Now...
You could make a decent argument that this would be the worst job of any BCS team. Think about it:
1. There is absolutely no tradition of sustained success at the program.
2. No matter what, you will always be second-class citizens behind the basketball team. Always.
3. Your fanbase doesn’t get loud, and will gladly leave games at halftime, even if they’re close, because they’d rather go drink.
4. While your practice facility is very nice and a good selling point, your stadium is very unimpressive or unique in any way.
5. Your local talent-base is extremely weak for FBS standards. That means you’re left competing for players from Texas, trying to convince them they’re better off coming to the middle of Kansas and trying to build up a program rather than going with a safer bet that’s much closer to home.
6. Even with all of these limitations, your fanbase apparently now expects you to go to a BCS bowl every other year, or you will be fired.
You really think Tuberville wants to walk into a situation where expectations are (apparently) as high as they were at Auburn, only with all of these other limitations?
I know this year has been extremely disappointing. But if we’re serious about building a real program here, we have to have stability. Without it, we’d only be setting ourselves back several years.
by KennyGregoryRockThaCradle on Nov 15, 2009 10:43 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
…your fanbase apparently now expects you to go to a BCS bowl every other year, or you will be fired.
I don’t expect a BCS bowl every other year, but we’ve gone from BCS to Insight to possibly none this year. 2007 is looking like more of a fluke than an indication of the direction of the program. Having said that, I’d give him next year to improve on this year.
Insanity is just a state of mind.
No I don't think Tuberville would be overly excited about it
But with the money Mangino is making and the talent on the team, I think some former big time coaches would definitely consider it. While our fans may have gotten unreasonable, we are nowhere near as bad as SEC fans with their expectations. Hence why Tuberville is unemployed to start with.
And if you read my synopsis, you will see that I said I disagree with firing Mangino and he has earned at least next season. I just wanted everyone’s feedback.
by Andrew Clark on Nov 16, 2009 11:19 AM CST up reply actions
I wasn't saying you were pushing for this, 08.
Sorry if I gave that impression. I just think it’s such an incredibly bad idea, so that’s my feedback on it.
I always wonder about “talent,” too- how much of our “improvement” in talent is due to these ranking services giving MM more credit after his success in 2007? Those star ratings get messed with all the time based upon what teams are after them.
McDougald, Tharp, and Opurum seem like the real deal, but we still haven’t found anyone with potential in the secondary, or really on the defensive line. By Kansas standards, the young talent we have right now is probably pretty great. But for a big-name coach, I doubt it’s anything spectacular.
by KennyGregoryRockThaCradle on Nov 16, 2009 2:21 PM CST up reply actions
as someone who grew up in Nebraska...
…and watched the Solich debacle, I think that we’re playing a very dangerous game.
Solich should have been fired after the 7-7 season (‘02), not the 9-3 regular season in ’03 (which ended up 10-3 after interim head coach Bo Pelini coached the team to a bowl victory). There would have been plenty of national understanding for the earlier firing, but after showing improvement, Nebraska was resoundingly ridiculed for the move. Given next year’s schedule (NDSU, GTech, So. Miss, NMSU, and BXIIS opponents Baylor, A&M and OSU), we could theoretically have seven or eight wins (losses to GT, SMU, OSU and NU and/or MU). While that would be a great season (for us), we could have those same wins without seeing any noticeable improvement in coaching.
So the question is this: Do we foresee changes in the coaching that would increase our ability to win games? Or are we happy with getting the wins in seasons when we play inferior competition (to even us), knowing the same play calling and coaching problems will exist?
Can we reasonably expect the coaching to improve?
My answer is “no.” We had plenty of opportunities to change course in games and between games this season, and the coaching staff decided not to. Not that we fans should determine the coaching of a game, but if we can see that the same four plays over and over again are failing, why can’t the coaches? If we can see that Sharp is not up to speed and that the running game needs to be altered to take advantage of Opurum’s strengths, why can’t the coaches? If we can see playing pass defense to not give up the big play but letting our opponent make 6-8 yard completions all game long eats up the clock and leaves our offense relying on big plays, why can’t the coaches?
Keeping Mangino seems to be the definition of insanity: Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
question might not even be if it's the way to go...
but whether Kansas can. What would the buyout be? and with the Gridiron club likely already hurting with the uncertainty surrounding things at the moment, is Lew Perkins willing to take another huge monetary gamble.
I’m not sure what side of the debate I fall on with this thing, but truthfully I’m not even sure it’s feasible if we wanted to. College coaching salaries kind of have universities by the balls right now. You have to back up the brinks truck if you want to keep em, then you can’t afford to get rid of em. That’s the issue Colorado is facing right now, and their guy never even won anything.
Some people are like Slinkies...not really good for anything but they make you smile when pushed down the stairs.
The problem was the knee jerk reaction of Mangino's extension.
Did I feel he deserve a raise and maybe a few more years? Absolutely. But before the Orange Bowl season, Mangino’s big12 record was terrible. Fast forward to 2007. We have a good team, play makers on both sides of the ball, learned lessons from a close but not there 2006. We beat 4 average teams on the road (CU, KSU, TAMU, Ok State) non of which made a bowl (maybe OSU did at like 6-6 I can’t remember), and we beat Baylor (sucked), ISU (sucked), Nebraska (we weren’t the only team to hang 70 on that defense) at home.
While 2008 was awesome, I feel that we may have pulled the trigger to fast on giving Mangino that huge contract, in hindsight. At the time I was absolutely all for it, I was in Miami for that game, I was deep in the hooplah as Romeo Crennel would say.
In hindsight we got tossed in Big12 play prior to 2007, and since the Orange Bowl, we are 5-10 (counting next week) in league play again and could finish 5-11 in league play at the end of the year.
IMO, 5-10 over two years league play is not good enough, especially coming off an Orange Bowl win, upgraded facilities and talent, and overall more and more resources being put into the football program.
I won’t count 2002, 2003, or 2004 because Mangino had Allen’s recruits still. But if we start at 2005, Mangino’s overall big12 record is 11-19 excluding the 2007 season. 11-19! That gets even worse if we tie in the early seasons.
Again my overall point is I do not think he should be fired. However if next season is anything like this one (1-7 or 2-6 conference record) then stuff needs to reaaaaaally be evaluated
by Andrew Clark on Nov 16, 2009 11:52 AM CST up reply actions
I'd agree...
we need to start winning games other than the ones we are heavily favored in…
I was reading complaints that the fans never stay in the seats during home games and I started thinking every game is a blowout in the past. Either us blowing someone out or them blowing us out. It’s time to start winning some close ones, beating some teams at home that we aren’t necessarily expected to, things like that.
Some people are like Slinkies...not really good for anything but they make you smile when pushed down the stairs.
Well..
We are 1-0 in OT games in Memorial. And we beat ranked ISU team looking for a Big 12 North Title.
Sawin' wood
Yes and we tore down the goal post after nearly every win that year as I recall. 2005?
Fact of the matter is we are pretty much no better than Baylor right now when you talk record, and Baylor plays in the South.
I’m not ready to fire the guy, but I am ready to stop looking for silver linings. Win some big, lose some big…talk about how we’re competitive in others. It’s time to beat some people who matter more regularly.
in ’07, ’08 and ’09
We beat a Ron Prince coached K-State…
a Callahan coached Nebraska…
a Dan Hawkins coached CU, who beat us this year
A&M in shambles
OSU prior to really hitting their stride
and Baylor before their coaching change.
Iowa State…eh, ok.
Missouri last year is obviously now our best win in the last 3 seasons and Iowa State this year would have to likely be your 2nd…that’s a bit of a blow. Doesn’t exactly support sustained success.
Some people are like Slinkies...not really good for anything but they make you smile when pushed down the stairs.
If the 2007 team wasn't that impressive in hindsight...
Then why should we have high expectations of the program now? Why has this season been such a “disaster”?
by KennyGregoryRockThaCradle on Nov 16, 2009 2:33 PM CST up reply actions
begs the question though...
is this team lowering the impressiveness of 2007, or does the view of 2007 lessen the disappointment of 2009.
Personally, I’m of the opinion that the teams struggles this season have hurt the “legacy” if you will of 2007. Had this team come out and played to their abilities, performed on the field and even come up a game short in the North I don’t think it would be as easy as it is now to look back at 2007 and wonder.
In ‘07 our special teams was solid, defense was good and the offense was on fire. Unfortunately I guess I’d say that regardless of those things anyone on the outside looking in has to see that as more of a fluke than the already did considering this year.
Some people are like Slinkies...not really good for anything but they make you smile when pushed down the stairs.
Except that many people never believed in Solich and he inherited a program
where he appeared to be in over his head from Day 1.
I used to work with an old man that told me. Son, every workplace has a dumbass, if you don't have one where you work, then I'm afraid you're it.
by Warden11 on Nov 16, 2009 11:31 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
I don't necessarily agree with that...
….but the point is not that Mangino and Solich are similar in any way except that they’re likely to have more success following bad years from luck and scheduling than making changes. And that 10-3 year was after Solich changed most of his assistants.
So what’s going to happen come January? Will Mangino fire the coordinators? Will that do any good? Will he let the new coordinators make decisions? Or will he overrule them?
What happened when Nebraska fired Solich?
A massive, epic disaster. If we were to buy out Mangino now, we’d be looking for a cheap replacement. The only way to do that is to make a BIG gamble on someone. If it didn’t immediately pay off, KU football might take another 20 years to recover.
If Self had been in way over his head with the basketball team, we could have found someone else with an established track record that would jump at the chance of getting that job. But football doesn’t have that luxury at all.
by KennyGregoryRockThaCradle on Nov 16, 2009 2:38 PM CST up reply actions
So DC what is this "the running game needs to be altered to take advantage of Opurum's strengths"
Seems like a lot of people think Mangino is a horrible coach for not running Opurum more. I can’t tell you all how much I disagree.
Toben is a TRUE freshman who needed to be deveoped. Remember, this kid fumbled in the first three games of his college career. Remember, this kid couldn’t pick up a block to save his life (or Todd’s) early this season. Remember, this kid never had more than 10-15 carries a game in high school.
So what do you expect Mangino to do?
Run Opurum 20-30 times a game? Shit, as soon as he comes in the D instantly stacks the box, knowing the kid is new and likely won’t be worth a shit pass protecting so the play is going to be a run. That’s like asking a fighter to figh Pacquiao with one hand tied behind your back. It’s just not fair to the kid. You could easily destroy a kid’s confidence and career throwing him to the Big 12 wolves like that. As far as player development goes, Mangino is doing right by this kid and I applaud him for that.
So what’s your other option? A gimpy Sharp.
So that leads a reasonable person to this conclusion: we’re playing offense with only one real option: passing. And that’s tough to do (again fighting Pacquiao with one hand tied behind your back).
Let’s flip it around and look at the defensive side of the ball. Through 10 games we’re ranked higher this year than last year (including total defense and scoring defense) with much younger kids and against (overall) a higher level of competition. Bah. Those stats lie! Bowen sucks! Mangino suck! Fire them all.
I just don’t get it, apparently.
And now some of you want to give him 2010 as a make or break year…..with a new QB (whoever that may be: Pick, Matthews, Webb)….hardly seem fair again.
Sawin' wood
by Rivethead on Nov 16, 2009 9:47 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
I have to say...
I love the passion from both of you as it relates to KU football.
That was one thing that stood out to me being back this weekend as well. Our fanbase still has a ways to go but being in that game for the better part of 4 quarters gave a little more fire to the fanbase. I got the feeling that even the old folks surrounding me were starting to realize the impact the fans have on a team and a program.
I honestly remember sitting down at the beginning of the game and thinking I don’t want to lose by a lot and I don’t want to win by a lot. I want to win in a great game so these fans stand in these seats for four quarters and show this team and these seniors some support.
There are certainly frustrations and I think I’m done with silver linings but it felt good to see our fanbase grow a little more this past weekend.
Some people are like Slinkies...not really good for anything but they make you smile when pushed down the stairs.
In all fairness
I think he was referring to the style of runs we use Toben for which I tend to agree with. It seems like every option and outside run Toben loses two yards and every smash up the middle he gains 5-6 with a chance for more because he is so tough to bring down with a full head of steam going downhill. The brutal coaching aspect is we continue to run the options outside, which according to a friend of mine who hates it so much as starting keeping track since the Colorado game, is averaging literally 0.4 ypc.
2010 is a make or break year for Mangino. While you bring up he is breaking in a new quarterback, the fact is he had his old qb/offense from the past two years and failed miserably this season. If he can’t get it done with the old reliables from the past (Reesing, Sharp, Meier, Briscoe, Stucky, Thornton, Harris, etc), I mean kids that have been here and contributed since they were all freshman/sophomores then he has to get it done with the new kids he has recruited, plain and simple. Couple this with an easier big 12 slate, I would see why a season like this one next year would put him on a very hot seat.
by Andrew Clark on Nov 16, 2009 11:30 AM CST up reply actions
I would get used to seeing the spread option
I have a feeling if we go with Pick that will be our base offense.
Me no likey Clint Bowen.
Thats fine
It suits Pick’s talents and when we run it with him it works. But Reesing is going to pitch it everytime and we are usually losing yards on the pitch. Which isn’t cool. Given Reesing’s fumble problems this season, plus the lack of effectiveness resulting from the play, I am baffled that we continue to run it 10 times a game
by Andrew Clark on Nov 16, 2009 12:16 PM CST up reply actions
Agreed.
And regarding running Toben laterally…..I hate it too, but what other choice do we have? You can’t just keep running him right up the middle….Big 12 D’s are not stupid. You have to run plays to keep them honest. And what other option do we have? Opurum or a gimpy Sharp.
F*cking Joque Crawford and Boyd-Anderson……really screwed us as far as RB depth goes.
Sawin' wood
+1 to the RB defections being a big hinderance
Some people are like Slinkies...not really good for anything but they make you smile when pushed down the stairs.
Problem is...
the old reliables were NOT this year. Did you see the 40 yard TD pass bounce right off of Jake Sharp’s hands on Saturday? Prime Example.
So that’s the coach’s fault?
Sawin' wood
by Rivethead on Nov 16, 2009 12:14 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
No its not
Poor coaching is running option plays that lose you yards everytime, like I pointed out earlier.
Look I’m just looking big picture here, not specific plays here and there. Including early years AND 2007 this is his record against league opponents:
Record against conference opponents
As of November 10, 2009.
Team Wins Losses Win Pct.
Baylor Bears 2 2 .500
Colorado Buffaloes 3 5 .375
Iowa State Cyclones 6 2 .750
Kansas State Wildcats 4 4 .500
Missouri Tigers 4 3 .571
Nebraska Cornhuskers 2 5 .286
Oklahoma Sooners 0 4 .000
Oklahoma State Cowboys 1 3 .250
Texas Longhorns 0 3 .000
Texas A&M Aggies 1 3 .250
Texas Tech Red Raiders 0 4 .000
Total 23 38 .377
vs. North 19 19 .500
vs. South 4 19 .174
Again, I DON’T think he should be fired. I’m just posting that if this continues we need to look at the possibility. Like Denver I’m tired of silver linings and excuses. We want results darn it.
Look why don’t we tell Lew to let us control the whole thing and we will all meet like the heads of the families in the godfather, I’ll make some drinks and we’ll discuss this in detail and make a plan of action for the present and future.
by Andrew Clark on Nov 16, 2009 12:33 PM CST up reply actions
You want results?
I want us to build a program the right way.
Next to Mark Mangino, Frank Beamer is one of my favorite coaches. They’re similar. Blue collar, hard working guys.
It took Frank Beamer 22 years of coaching Va Tech before he won a BCS Bowl. It took Frank Beamer 7 years just to get Va Tech to a bowl (which the lost).
But more importantly, he’s done it right. Clean program, high graduation rates, successful NFL careers.
Now, we can be patient and let Coach Mangino follow the Beamer path (and by all accounts he’s on a much faster track and doing so within a much more difficult conference). Or we can be impatient and fire him, and start all over with……..uh…….wait…….uh…….sh*t………Uh……ummm….who really wants to come to Kansas?
Sawin' wood
EXACTLY!
College football isn’t a level playing ground. At all. Certain schools have built-in disadvantages at this point, and we are one of them (see my list above).
I don’t care if we brought in Nick Saban- he’s going to have an incredibly difficult time convincing the best high schoolers in Texas that it’s in their best interest to go somewhere farther from home that has no tradition and lukewarm fan support.
The only way we’ll be able to build something out of nothing is with stability in the program. That’s how KState did it. That’s how VTech did it. That’s how Boise State did it (even when their coach was taken away, they promoted from within and didn’t miss a beat).
Firing a guy because of ONE bad year is the complete opposite of stability.
by KennyGregoryRockThaCradle on Nov 16, 2009 2:46 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Gotta agree with most of your points
we just aren’t at a place where we can build a great program without stability.
Considering where we were and have been in the past, even high expectations that are disappointingly not met are better than the crap we used to throw out on the field. Easier schedule next season with a load of young players with experience means a fresh start
by I need more Esteban on Nov 17, 2009 11:26 AM CST up reply actions
I want a program built the right way as well.
Mangino did an unbelievable job in taking the program to a complete joke to a bowl caliber team year in and year out. The biggest question is can it go further? I think the alarming thing is that things are regressing fast from 2007. Last season, harder schedule no surprise factor, sure 7-5 can happen. But this year… man. Mostly I am just frustrated.
Not including bowl wins and just going by regular season we have won 6, 4, 6, 6, 11, 7, 5/6 games under Mangino. A huge step from the past. My overall argument is that if we go say 5-7 or 6-6 again next year, we need to start thinking if someone may be able to take things higher.
Build a program sure. But lately I’m seeing something built come crumbling down. I don’t know if you are content with 6-7 wins every year. Personally, I want more. Mangino and Kansas want more. Lets see if he can get it done in 2010 and 2011. If we keep losing more games than we win, then I’m not going to suggest we sit and keep hoping for the magic to come back.
Fact is we aren’t building a program anymore. Its built. We’ve won a BCS game, we’ve had 3 strait strong recruiting classes which follow a few solid ones. We HAVE a program. There shouldn’t be any more “future” talk. The time to win is now. This year sucked. Lets do better next year. Case closed. I’m reserving overall judgement at the earliest for the end of next season with an entire team of recruits mostly from post orange bowl classes and more winable league games.
by Andrew Clark on Nov 16, 2009 1:20 PM CST up reply actions
I can't agree with your last paragraph (except for this year sucking).
We’re still in the early stages of building a program. Our program isn’t even close to being built. Hell, look at fan support for evidence of that. And really, our recruiting hasn’t been anything special (steadily improving though) until last year’s group (now that the facilities are built, we can finally use them to recruit – remember the Orange Bowl team didn’t have the luxury of those fancy fields/training rooms/locker rooms/xbox360s). I call last year’s group special simply because of how awesome Opurum and McDougald turned out (and Tharp).
Fact is, we’re still less than a decade out from being one of the worst D1 football programs in the world. It’s simply unreasonable to expect us to be conference title contender, bowl eligible, world beater (on a consistent basis) this quickly. Especially at a basketball school with basketball fans.
Look, I’m a man. I’m (almost) 40. So I’ve got much less time to wait for this program to be built than you do. But we need to be patient. Our 2010 recruiting class is ranked higher than any other Big 12 North team right now. In four or five years, that will make a difference.
Sawin' wood
agreed as well...
we’re in the early stages for sure…this thing had a LONG way to go when MANGO came along. As I’ve always said though, I’m looking for consistent 8,9 and the occasional 10 win season. I don’t need a BCS bowl every year but I do want some wins to hang our hats on and say look “we’re in business here”…didn’t get that this year, primarily disappointing because of the expectations set. I’m okay with that here and there but it can’t become the norm.
I’m personally of the opinion that next year may not be as dire as some think. Easier schedule or not, I think we can improve next year from this year and continue building.
Some people are like Slinkies...not really good for anything but they make you smile when pushed down the stairs.
I know it had a long way to go
And everyone keeps posting towards me like I’m calling for Mangino’s head and I’m not doing that at all. My point is that 5 wins this year isn’t what we want and I expected the 8-9 win seasons after the Orange Bowl.
My point was that in the future if we continue to win 5-6 games a year that coaching seat will become hot and with reason, IMO.
Lets not forget that a LOT of people were calling for Mangino’s head in 2006. Some people say had we not beaten one win (or was it two) Colorado that it may have been the final straw. The interesting thing is how true was this (I think this was mostly overblown). As the original article suggests, if Lew was getting impatient then, how is he going to feel now?
I agree with everything you guys are saying and think the big man has earned some more time, I’m mostly trying to get debate going and show both sides of the story. I guess when it comes down to it I
a) have not been impressed with the coaching this season, and I know many of you share a similar view.
b) am really disappointed that the Orange Bowl hasn’t lead to a bigger payoff in terms of wins and that the next two seasons got worse and worse.
c) feel that overall when you get the big bucks and the facilities and other support, you’re always subject to scrutiny when your team is having a season like this.
In your opinion, if we continue to struggle (and god willing we don’t and this isn’t an issue) at what point is Mangino officially on the hot seat Charlie Frontbutt style?
by Andrew Clark on Nov 16, 2009 2:30 PM CST up reply actions
Didn't mean to seem like I was posting towards you
I was more just agreeing and throwing in my two cents on whether we are building, have built or are currently tearing down the program.
I get what you are saying and very glad for the discussion, it’s some great stuff…keep it coming.
As far as this season I think I’m with you as well. This staff, the players and the AD set an expectation of being pretty darn good this year. It’s been that much more disappointing because of it and I absolutely agree that there are coaching decisions I completely disagree with.
As far as the Orange Bowl leading to wins…that was 2007. We have literally had two classes that were impacted by that and they are all sophs, frosh or rsfreshman. If we are relying on that age group to win ball games we’re already in trouble. I do think as they become Jr’s/Sr’s that’s when we might finally reap those benefits.
I’d make the same point in terms of facilities. Very new, very early in terms of their impact being felt. Todd, Dezmon, Kerry, Jake, Stuckey…all recruited before that thing had broken ground. It’ll pay off.
For me Mangino officially goes on the hot seat if we lay an egg again next year. At that point I think he heads into 2011 with a VERY hot seat. That would be a team heavy with upperclassman that have had the benefits of the aforementioned advantages and if they don’t produce I’d be ready to say something has to change.
I think we all agree here and there on the issues and truthfully I haven’t seen an opinion that is so skewed one way or the other. Just a little difference on when, how and why we should be getting there.
Some people are like Slinkies...not really good for anything but they make you smile when pushed down the stairs.
Yeah...
With the recruiting classes, I guess I’m bummed because we still have so many core pieces from the Orange Bowl win (and missing a few core ones too sure) but we DO have some mainstays who are even older and more experienced than they were then AND young talent from those classes. I guess that is just why we all hoped for more.
I completely agree with your timetable, and it is on par with my original post. If we lay an egg next year I think Mangino heads into 2011 on a very hot seat.
Lets just all hope and pray next year there are Toben cleat marks on our opponents’ chests and we kick some ass.
by Andrew Clark on Nov 16, 2009 2:47 PM CST up reply actions
"And everyone keeps posting towards me like I’m calling for Mangino’s head and I’m not doing that at all."
I know you’re not. Sorry if it seemed like that.
This has been a GREAT discussion. Really, this is what rockchalktalk.com is all about!
Sawin' wood
+1
Some people are like Slinkies...not really good for anything but they make you smile when pushed down the stairs.
plus dos
Grad wins. And I’m glad we cleared that up :) haha. I think in the end we are all pissy about this season. Mangino should let us put on some pads and go take it out on the Longhorns.
Scratch that idea. I don’t want to lose a limb
by Andrew Clark on Nov 16, 2009 4:48 PM CST up reply actions
Winners win and losers complain about the breaks they get.
Not even really related but I remember thinking that when I saw that play. When things are going well, those catches are always made.
I used to work with an old man that told me. Son, every workplace has a dumbass, if you don't have one where you work, then I'm afraid you're it.
I do agree though
That the poor play by our seniors this year have really been alarming.
by Andrew Clark on Nov 16, 2009 1:22 PM CST up reply actions
what about a better season?
What happens if we end up winning an extra game or two, but nothing really changes?
Next season if we win say 8 games
With a new qb and what will also be a fairly new/tweaked offense with more run emphasis, I’d say thats a pretty good season. If we are really competitive and seem like we are still maturing and finding our groove I won’t be too upset if its not a crazy good season in terms of wins. I’m not sure what to make of it all.
What exactly are we talking about in changes, you mean we continue to struggle against north teams and get an extra win from say a Baylor and A&M? Then I could def see your point that we have more wins but we have the same problem in trying to compete for the North.
by Andrew Clark on Nov 16, 2009 1:28 PM CST up reply actions
8 wins in a major BCS football conference with the opportunity to go somewhere over the Holidays and win a 9th is dead on with where we want to be on a consistent basis.
When Rivet says we were one of the worst programs in the country when Mangino took over he isn’t lying
117ish teams in division 1…we were near the bottom…
I was recently telling a player that I attended a game where 10,000 fans were in attendance…he told me “not a chance I’d be here if that was still the case”
Some people are like Slinkies...not really good for anything but they make you smile when pushed down the stairs.
by Owen on Nov 16, 2009 2:17 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
your 2nd scenario
I’m talking about the second scenario: getting creamed in the North but having a better record next season because of the BXIIS bottom dwellers.
"Over and over again"
That’s where I have to disagree on this I think. We have now had ONE year where Mangino didn’t meet our “expectations.” We fire him after that, and we will become a toxic coaching environment.
We aren’t Nebraska, for all the reasons I mentioned before. It’s crazy to even make that comparison. You also seem to be ignoring the whole Bill Callahan fiasco. While a program like Nebraska can recover from something like that, Kansas football cannot.
Screw it, let’s be blunt here- the only reason we got a coach as good as Mangino in the first place, and the only reason he’s stuck around as long as he has, is because he’s morbidly obese. Even if you do go out and find some hotshot that takes us back to the Orange Bowl next year, the likelihood is extremely high that he just uses us as a stepping stone to go on to bigger and better things.
by KennyGregoryRockThaCradle on Nov 16, 2009 2:29 PM CST up reply actions
In terms of that though
I think the big issue isn’t talent its putting it all together. I mean our offense obviously has talent and showed that the past two years. Its there. On paper, our D should be better and has improved throughout the year IMO. We don’t need someone to come in and recruit better, I feel like our coaches have done a heck of a job recruiting and starting to bring some good talent in. Its just we aren’t necessarily seeing it on the field.
Maybe it is too early for some of these higher level recruits to really be making an impact, which is why I said we need more time.
I think the overall issue is trying to figure out where it went wrong this year. I think our players could have played better and our coaches could have coached and schemed better. I think blame should be placed everywhere and not just on one. But it might take us way too long to dissect everything. Unfortunately what the article points out is that often blame (fairly or unfairly) gets placed at the top.
by Andrew Clark on Nov 16, 2009 2:38 PM CST up reply actions
point blank...
as you elude to there was just a disconnect across the board. Something went wrong and when you start sliding it can be tough to stop. Players not making the routing plays, coaches making some questionable decisions in the minds of many and a confidence issue a likely side effect.
Some people are like Slinkies...not really good for anything but they make you smile when pushed down the stairs.
I'm betting...
This is another case where the guys at KUSports know what’s going on, but aren’t talking because they need the access to the coaching staff. Remember after the brawl how Keenan was like, “oh yeah, this has been happening for a really long time blah blah blah”?
If something serious has happened this year with the relationship between players and coaches, we won’t find out anything until Mangino leaves, IMO.
by KennyGregoryRockThaCradle on Nov 16, 2009 2:55 PM CST up reply actions
I'm not even referring to that possibility..
although I know it’s rumored out there. I’m simply saying we’ve had some players who haven’t performed up to snuff and the coaches seem a little…hesitant, cautious, irrational…not sure what the word I’m looking for is.
In general just not quite right.
Some people are like Slinkies...not really good for anything but they make you smile when pushed down the stairs.
I will say this.....
Mangino was awful critical of himself after the T Tech game (and rightly so). I’d never heard him bag on himself like that before.
In fact, it’s pretty rare to find a BCS conference coach call his own coaching performance “horrible”.
Fact is, Mangino is calling a spade and spade. That tells me two things: 1) he’s just as frustrated and upset as we are, and 2) he’s got confidence that his job is relatively safe (if you’re on the hot seat, I doubt you go saying stuff like that!)
Sawin' wood
simply using NU
I was simply using NU as an example. When the wins come not because the team is better but because the competition is worse, you have to worry. And I’m posing just that scenario, using what happened in Lincoln as a comparison. Had they fired Solich the year before, they would have been in better shape to land a better coach. Since they waited, it was a much worse PR situation.
Hey guys?
Mangino is a damn good coach.
And I’m a Missouri fan.
So, yeah. Consider that.
What do tigers dream of when they take a little tiger snooze? Do they dream of mauling zebras, or Halle Berry in her Catwoman suit?
After reading through the comments about being upset at the "progress" of the program,
one other program immediately came to mind- a school that was just as horrible and awful as KU’s. This program went on a run of winning 9+ games for 10 years or so. Made it to 11 straight bowl games. The next 5 seasons after all of that success they averaged just a little over 5 wins a season.
Who was that school? And do you really think ONE Orange Bowl and a few other bowls means KU’s program is built already?
I used to work with an old man that told me. Son, every workplace has a dumbass, if you don't have one where you work, then I'm afraid you're it.
Yeah but KState is lame
And you can’t really compare the two in terms of wins. In Snyder’s 5th season (1993) until 2003, KSU won 11 games 6 times, 10 games once and 9 games three times (which is crazy). So obviously he enjoyed a bit more success, the type of consistency Denver mentioned earlier year in and year out.
I’ll agree that our program isn’t fully built yet, but if you want to compare programs then fine lets compare them. Like I said, in Snyder’s 5th season he started off a run that was insane 9,9,9,10,11,11,11,11 wins. That is the pinnacle of consistency and I think what we all would like.
The problem with the “built already not built already” argument is this is Mangino’s eight season, and he is going to finish with a lower/ the same win totals as he had in 2003, 2005, 2006 etc. And the Big12 North this year is as weak as it has ever been since I first went to KU (2004) and I’m willing to argue that all day long.
I think Mangino needs some more time, especially for some of the young players he has now to mature some more, and because it was one down year. But if we are “building a program” I want to see consistent winning not 2,6,4,7,6,12 (YESSSS), 8 (not too bad), 5 (shit). Like I said though, lets hope its just one bump in the road and hope we do better next year before getting to rash.
by Andrew Clark on Nov 16, 2009 7:34 PM CST up reply actions
My point is more to show that no matter how much success a school like KU has,
they will likely be on shaky footing for a very long time. K-State saw how quickly that “program” can disappear and I can’t think of anything that would make KU invincible to the exact same problem.
I used to work with an old man that told me. Son, every workplace has a dumbass, if you don't have one where you work, then I'm afraid you're it.
by Warden11 on Nov 16, 2009 8:13 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Apples to Cow Dung
I’d argue that it’s unfair to compare KU to Snyder’s KSU program (1st go). Remember, Snyder was able to recruit prop 48 players, fly them on private jets to Manhattan, and sign them up and play them. These were good football players…..but horrible student athletes.
Times have changed. No prop 48. No private jets. Academic standards. It’s a world of difference. Mangino tried to play that game early on (Monroe Weekly) and look where it got us.
Sawin' wood
Uh oh did I bring this up too soon?
http://www.kansascity.com/news/breaking_news/story/1575397.html
Perkins meeting with players to discuss Mangino? Can someone please tell me what the hell is going on? Anyone got an inside scoop?
That can't be good.
There’s an investigation. Where there’s smoke, their usually is fire.
Nice of the former players’ parents to wait until now to voice their concerns – that’s suspicious to me.
We may be starting the football program building over sooner than many expected, if this has any teeth.
Sawin' wood
not just former players...
they are doing one on one’s with some current players as well.
Some people are like Slinkies...not really good for anything but they make you smile when pushed down the stairs.
So the rumor at KUSports.com is
it has something to do with DJ Beshears.
And Mangino will be fired this afternoon.
Sawin' wood
Would they fire him tonight?
It takes attention away from basketball. But basketball will also provide some decent cover and other stuff to talk about tomorrow.
That’s more interesting than caring what actually happens.
I used to work with an old man that told me. Son, every workplace has a dumbass, if you don't have one where you work, then I'm afraid you're it.
It's all a dastardly plot!
To take attention away from Zack Greinke winning the Cy Young award today. (Dwayne Bowe of the Chiefs also was suspended 4 weeks for violating the NFL’s drug policy.)
Even when the Royals do something right, they get no press. :)
by hunter s. royal on Nov 17, 2009 2:42 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Heh.
This entire debate now seems quaint.
RODD TEESING, my arch-nemesis! Give us back our TODD, you rapscallion!
by KennyGregoryRockThaCradle on Nov 17, 2009 6:11 PM CST reply actions
I don't even know if it ever was a debate per se
It was more some of us wanted next year/two years to be a little more of a hot seat while others threw it out of the question. I don’t think one of us wanted him fired now. But yeah, funny how things shape up.
If shit does go down I’m probably going to a post why it was a dumb decision, barring if the attacks on players, racial slurs, etc allegations prove true. Then Lew wasn’t left with much of a choice combining that and the season.
by Andrew Clark on Nov 17, 2009 6:51 PM CST up reply actions

by 

















